지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2022.11
- 수록면
- 304 - 337 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.38080/crh.2022.11.141.304
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
By reexamining the nature of the court disputes over the queen dowager, suspected of her involvement in a treason case, and the causes for the Palace Coup of 1623, which dethroned the king who had con fined the queen dowager in her palace, this review article refutes Prof. Oh Soo-chang’s criticism against my monograph Mohu ǔi panyǒk (The treason of the queen dowager). Unlike prof. Oh who argued that the essence of the disputes was the issue of king’s disloyalty to the queen dowager, the key nature of the disputes was whether the king had to punish the queen dowager, his stepmother, who was charged of seeking treason, according to the state law based on the Confucian value of ch’ung or kongǔi (loyalty) or show mercy to her adopting another Confucian value of hyo or saǔn (filial piety). There were many similar cases and debates on the queen dowagers who were involved in treason cases in Chinese history. The majority of Neo-Confucian scholars like Zhu Xi (1130~1200), in particular, placed much more emphasis on ch’ung and even thought that the queen dowager should have been punished.
In Chosǒn Korea in the early 1600s the great controversy came to an end by confining the queen dowager in her palace, but the king was dethroned five years later by a palace coup. According to the message promulgated in the name of the Queen Dowager immediately following the coup, the causes for the coup can be classified broadly into two categories: the deposed king’s betrayal of Ming China to the barbaric Manchu (43%) and the confinement of the queen dowager and the murder of her young son (31%). The later sources, however, tended not to cite the betrayal of Ming China, but excessively emphasized the confinement of the queen dowager, a serious royal violation of the Confucian value hyo. The issue of foreign policy, the betrayal of the Ming emperor, was struck off the official causes for the coup.
During the Manchu invasion of Korea (1636~1637), King Injo (r. 1623~1649), who led the coup and ascended the throne, eventually surrendered to the Manchu emperor, with the result that one of the primary causes for the coup was now lost. In order to maintain his legitimacy and offset the lost cause with the other one, Injo and his officials had little option but to lay utmost emphasis on the former king’s unfilial act. Although prof. Oh insists that the coup was a righteous restoration to eliminate royal depravity, the causes for the coup were not singular and morphed as time went on, depending on the political situations in domestic and foreign affairs.
In Chosǒn Korea in the early 1600s the great controversy came to an end by confining the queen dowager in her palace, but the king was dethroned five years later by a palace coup. According to the message promulgated in the name of the Queen Dowager immediately following the coup, the causes for the coup can be classified broadly into two categories: the deposed king’s betrayal of Ming China to the barbaric Manchu (43%) and the confinement of the queen dowager and the murder of her young son (31%). The later sources, however, tended not to cite the betrayal of Ming China, but excessively emphasized the confinement of the queen dowager, a serious royal violation of the Confucian value hyo. The issue of foreign policy, the betrayal of the Ming emperor, was struck off the official causes for the coup.
During the Manchu invasion of Korea (1636~1637), King Injo (r. 1623~1649), who led the coup and ascended the throne, eventually surrendered to the Manchu emperor, with the result that one of the primary causes for the coup was now lost. In order to maintain his legitimacy and offset the lost cause with the other one, Injo and his officials had little option but to lay utmost emphasis on the former king’s unfilial act. Although prof. Oh insists that the coup was a righteous restoration to eliminate royal depravity, the causes for the coup were not singular and morphed as time went on, depending on the political situations in domestic and foreign affairs.
목차
1. 논지의 충돌 지점
2. 논쟁의 성격: 충과 효의 충돌
3. 주희와 중국 유학자들의 생각
4. 반정의 명분 조정
5. 효치국가의 의미
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
4월혁명과 5·16군사쿠데타에서 미국의 역할
역사비평
2015 .11
-
仁祖 즉위 이후 권력장악과 인목대비의 위상
동양학
2022 .01
-
5·16 쿠데타와 ‘서비스’의 젠더정치
역사비평
2021 .05
-
광해군, 두 개의 상반된 평가
韓國史學史學報
2015 .01
-
인조의 대중국 외교에 대한 비판적 고찰
역사비평
2017 .11
-
예외상태 법 이론으로 쿠데타 세력에 동조한 법학자 다시 읽기
역사비평
2025 .02
-
Unfolding Relations between Joseon and Ming during the Ming-Qing Transition
Journal of Northeast Asian History
2019 .06
-
계엄이라는 ‘체계’의 형성, 1952~1972
역사비평
2025 .02
-
광주 학살의 내재성 -쿠데타, 베트남전쟁, 내전
역사비평
2020 .05
-
조선시대 대비 지위와 인조반정의 재검토 - 계승범 교수의 『모후의 반역』 비판
역사비평
2022 .08
-
仁祖代 前半期 왕권과 정치질서 재편 (1623~1636)
한국사학보
2020 .02
-
계승범 교수의 「인목대비 폐위 논쟁과 인조반정의 명분」에 부치는 재비판
역사비평
2023 .05
-
군부 권위주의로 회귀하는 미얀마 - 민간-군부관계로 본 쿠데타의 역동성 -
역사교육
2022 .03
-
인조반정 관련 신이담 연구
구비문학연구
2022 .12
-
李适의 亂이 仁祖代 초반 대내외 정책에 미친 여파
전북사학
2016 .01
-
홍서봉의 가계와 정치적 활동
한국사상과 문화
2019 .01
-
최인훈의 「구운몽」 연구 - 시대 상황을 중심으로 -
현대문학이론연구
2016 .01
-
‘癸亥反正’에 대한 향반층의 문학적 대응 - 정훈·강복중을 중심으로
고전문학연구
2015 .01
-
복합 담화 표지어 (et) donc du coup의 의미와 운율 분석
프랑스학연구
2020 .01
-
明淸交替 시기 朝中關係의 추이
동양사학연구
2017 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
조선시대 대비 지위와 인조반정의 재검토 - 계승범 교수의 『모후의 반역』 비판
오수창
역사비평
2022
.08
계승범 교수의 「인목대비 폐위 논쟁과 인조반정의 명분」에 부치는 재비판
오수창
역사비평
2023
.05
KCS선형의 천수영역에서의 자세 변화에 대한 실험적 연구
윤근항
,
박병재
,
여동진
대한조선학회 논문집
2014
.02
『모후의 반역』에 대한 오수창 교수와 계승범 교수의 논쟁을 바라보며
정다함
역사비평
2023
.05
세종의 훈민정음 제정에 대한 국어사 연구의 서사와 그 문제점들 - 이기문의 학설에 대한 비판을 중심으로
정다함
역사비평
2023
.02
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0