지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study is to find out the various source layers that appear in this text through a literary critical study of Exodus 13 : 17-14: 31. Through this study, the present writer tries to find answers to some fundamental questions about the recent literary criticism of Exodus and the Pentateuch. In particular, the writer tries to find a new way to classify and understand the traditional J and E sources, which have recently been classified as non-priestly layers by scholars.
In this study, the writer reveals that the layer that leads the basic flow in this story of crossing the Red Sea is P. The P material in this text is mainly YHWH’s command and fulfillment, the persecution of Pharaoh whose heart was hardened by YHWH, the pursuit of the Egyptian army, the miracle at sea and the role of Moses as a miracle performer, YHWH helping Moses perform the miracle, and the death of Egyptian armies in the sea and the glory of YHWH. In this account, the writer classifies 14: 1-4, 8-10, 15-18, 22-23, 26-29 as the P layer.
In this miracle story, it is not easy to read the text as a unified story except for the priestly material layer. However, it can be seen that this part is related to the dramatic events caused by Israel’s flight. Therefore, this non-priestly layer consists of the pursuit of Pharaoh’s army, Israel’s fears and complaints, and God’s miracles and acts of salvation to save Israel.
The writer divides 13: 17-19, 20-22, 14 : 5-7, 11-14, 19-20, 21, 24-25, 30-31 into the non-priestly layer of the text. This non-priestly layer is composed of the post-priestly editing layer (13 : 20-22; 14 : 5-7, 11-14, 19-20) and the post-priestly deuteronomistic redaction (Exodus 13 : 17-19; 14 : 21, 24-25, 30-31). Through this study, we find that the texts that scholars previously claimed to be sources J and E through classical source criticism are editorial extensions added to the basic layer rather than independent sources, and they are all post-priestly or post-deuteronomistic layers. It can be confirmed that this is a post-deuteronomistic addition. And we assert that the addition of post-deuteronomistic layer was made later than the editorial work of the post-priestly layer.
In this study, the writer reveals that the layer that leads the basic flow in this story of crossing the Red Sea is P. The P material in this text is mainly YHWH’s command and fulfillment, the persecution of Pharaoh whose heart was hardened by YHWH, the pursuit of the Egyptian army, the miracle at sea and the role of Moses as a miracle performer, YHWH helping Moses perform the miracle, and the death of Egyptian armies in the sea and the glory of YHWH. In this account, the writer classifies 14: 1-4, 8-10, 15-18, 22-23, 26-29 as the P layer.
In this miracle story, it is not easy to read the text as a unified story except for the priestly material layer. However, it can be seen that this part is related to the dramatic events caused by Israel’s flight. Therefore, this non-priestly layer consists of the pursuit of Pharaoh’s army, Israel’s fears and complaints, and God’s miracles and acts of salvation to save Israel.
The writer divides 13: 17-19, 20-22, 14 : 5-7, 11-14, 19-20, 21, 24-25, 30-31 into the non-priestly layer of the text. This non-priestly layer is composed of the post-priestly editing layer (13 : 20-22; 14 : 5-7, 11-14, 19-20) and the post-priestly deuteronomistic redaction (Exodus 13 : 17-19; 14 : 21, 24-25, 30-31). Through this study, we find that the texts that scholars previously claimed to be sources J and E through classical source criticism are editorial extensions added to the basic layer rather than independent sources, and they are all post-priestly or post-deuteronomistic layers. It can be confirmed that this is a post-deuteronomistic addition. And we assert that the addition of post-deuteronomistic layer was made later than the editorial work of the post-priestly layer.
목차
1. 들어가며
2. 연구사
3. 본문의 자료층 분석
4. 나가는 말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
제사장 문서에 ‘혼돈과의 전쟁’ 모티프가 있는가? — 창세기 1:2; 8:1; 출애굽기 14:21을 중심으로 —
성경원문연구
2022 .10
-
Priestly Formation in the Korean Church : Teachings from Scripture and Tradition on the Priestly Ministry and Formation, and its Application in the Korean Context
Catholic Theology and Thought
2015 .06
-
신명기 형성의 마지막 단계에 대한 논의: 신명기 4장 1-49절을 중심으로
구약논단
2023 .06
-
금송아지 본문(출 32-34장)에 대한 최근 연구사
한국기독교신학논총
2018 .10
-
출애굽기 1:1-15:21에 나타난 ‘이름’의 문학적 및 신학적 의미
성경원문연구
2017 .10
-
라보브의 두 가지 언어 변화 유형에 근거한 후르비츠의 제사장 자료 연대 결정 평가
Canon&Culture
2023 .10
-
Israel’s Identity, Fall, and Destiny in the Book of Jubilees
성경원문연구
2021 .04
-
민수기에 제사장 문서(P)가 존재하는가?
한국기독교신학논총
2019 .01
-
내적 인간으로서의 교구 사제 생활의 역동성
신학전망
2017 .12
-
성막과 제사장의 관계와 그 의의
Canon&Culture
2023 .10
-
시내산 언약체결 본문(출 19:1-24:11)에 나타나는 사상적 갈등
구약논단
2017 .12
-
이스라엘 종교사로 본 화해 신학
구약논단
2019 .06
-
Layer-wise Semantic Role Labeling with the KR-BERT Language Model
언어
2022 .09
-
구약성경의 기적 이야기에 대한 고찰: 탈출기 14장의 바다 사건을 중심으로
Catholic Theology and Thought
2022 .06
-
The Story of Greater Exodus in Hebrews: A Narrative Reading of Hebrews 3-4
ACTS 신학저널
2021 .10
-
Event Structure and Three Layers of Merge
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2018 .12
-
출애굽기 3장 : 본문의 복합성과 그 방법론적 함의
장신논단
2015 .12
-
기적에 대한 신학적 이해: 신학과 과학의 교차점에서
Catholic Theology and Thought
2022 .06
-
금송아지 이야기(출 32)에 반영된 레위 성전경비대의 이미지
구약논단
2021 .09
-
‘YHWH 유일신 신앙’ 탄생 과정과 YHWH의 위상 변화
신학사상
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
출애굽기 1:1-15:21에 나타난 ‘이름’의 문학적 및 신학적 의미
유윤종
성경원문연구
2017
.10
[김회권의 성서해설] 중보자 모세-출애굽기 32-34장
김회권
기독교사상
2004
.06
열왕기하 23장 13절의 역사 연구
이은우
구약논단
2021
.03
제사장 문서에 ‘혼돈과의 전쟁’ 모티프가 있는가? — 창세기 1:2; 8:1; 출애굽기 14:21을 중심으로 —
배선복
성경원문연구
2022
.10
내러티브 비평으로 본 바로의 민족말살(genocide) 정책 : 출 1:1-14을 중심으로
장석정
Canon&Culture
2015
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2023-023-001319727