지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2024.6
- 수록면
- 207 - 236 (30page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2024.6.102.207
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since the establishment of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), the Science Society of China(中國科學社, SSC) had hovered between existence and abolition until its end in May 1960. This article explores the complex processes in which the SSC faced crossroads between existence and abolition in the 1950s.
First of all, there were conflicting views within the SSC. In particular, Ren Hongjun and Zhu Kezhen had different visions of the SSC’s future.
Second, scientific organizations in the scientific community underwent major transformations during the time. As the Science Union(科聯), which consolidated professional societies, was established in August 1950, the China Association for Natural Science(中華自然科學社) and the Society of Chinese Scientific Workers(中國科學工作者協會) immediately declared their abolition. On the other hand, the SSC(中國科學社) and the Chinese Culture & Arts Society(中華學藝社) have managed to survive.
Third, there was confrontation of opinions among scientists over the meaning of science in a “New China”. For example, the China Democratic League(中國民主同盟) expounded the so-called “Science Doctrine (科學綱領)”in June 1957 but the “Science Doctrine”was soon attacked during the Anti-Rightist Campaign.
In other words, there were divisions and confrontations in three dimensions: the internal conflict within the SSC, divisions among scientific organizations, and confrontation in the scientists’ society. On the one hand, Ren Hongjun’s vision of the SSC, the existence of the SSC, and the “Science Doctrine” formed one camp, and on the other hand, Zhu Kezhen’s plan for the SSC, the abolition of the China Association for Natural Science, and the Anti-Rightist Campaign represented the opposite position. This article argues that the opposition between these two trends in the field of science during the 1950s resulted from the confrontation between the two different visions of science - “professional science” versus “mass science.” In other words, the former aimed to encourage experts to produce scientific knowledge and spread it to the public, and the latter encouraged the masses to actively participate in scientific activities without limiting the subject of scientific knowledge production to experts.
First of all, there were conflicting views within the SSC. In particular, Ren Hongjun and Zhu Kezhen had different visions of the SSC’s future.
Second, scientific organizations in the scientific community underwent major transformations during the time. As the Science Union(科聯), which consolidated professional societies, was established in August 1950, the China Association for Natural Science(中華自然科學社) and the Society of Chinese Scientific Workers(中國科學工作者協會) immediately declared their abolition. On the other hand, the SSC(中國科學社) and the Chinese Culture & Arts Society(中華學藝社) have managed to survive.
Third, there was confrontation of opinions among scientists over the meaning of science in a “New China”. For example, the China Democratic League(中國民主同盟) expounded the so-called “Science Doctrine (科學綱領)”in June 1957 but the “Science Doctrine”was soon attacked during the Anti-Rightist Campaign.
In other words, there were divisions and confrontations in three dimensions: the internal conflict within the SSC, divisions among scientific organizations, and confrontation in the scientists’ society. On the one hand, Ren Hongjun’s vision of the SSC, the existence of the SSC, and the “Science Doctrine” formed one camp, and on the other hand, Zhu Kezhen’s plan for the SSC, the abolition of the China Association for Natural Science, and the Anti-Rightist Campaign represented the opposite position. This article argues that the opposition between these two trends in the field of science during the 1950s resulted from the confrontation between the two different visions of science - “professional science” versus “mass science.” In other words, the former aimed to encourage experts to produce scientific knowledge and spread it to the public, and the latter encouraged the masses to actively participate in scientific activities without limiting the subject of scientific knowledge production to experts.
목차
머리말
Ⅰ. 任鴻雋과 竺可楨 : 中國科學社 내부의 이견
Ⅱ. 中國科學社와 中華自然科學社 : 과학단체의 분화
Ⅲ. 민주동맹 “과학강령”과 반우파투쟁 : 과학자사회의 대립
맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『朝鮮義勇隊通訊』의 旣影印刊物에 누락되었던 號·期·面들
한국독립운동사연구
2021 .11
-
한중인문학 30년 회고와 전망
한중인문학연구
2021 .01
-
해방 전후 정인보의 교유 관계
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2023 .03
-
중국 ‘과학구국’ 사상과 현대 과학 이념 발전 연구
중국학논총
2019 .01
-
중국 시진핑 정권의 권력구조와 종교정책에 관한 연구
신학과 목회
2019 .05
-
동남아시아 화교 이민사 연구 -신중국 수립 이후를 중심으로-
중국학논총
2023 .03
-
한국 전근대 과학기술사 연구의 현황과 과제
한국과학사학회지
2020 .01
-
Science and Politics, Ethics of Scientist
윤리연구
2017 .01
-
The Continuity and Change of North Korea’s China Policy under Kim Jong-un
중국지식네트워크
2022 .11
-
20세기 후기 중국 공상과학소설 속 비극성에 관한 고찰
중국어문학
2022 .04
-
元代 과학기술의 思想 基礎와 分類
중국어문학논집
2022 .12
-
浅谈中韩文化交流的现状、问题与对策 ― 以中国视角为中心
중국학
2017 .01
-
Translation as an Expression of Ren
Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture
2020 .02
-
한중간 철학사상 연구의 성과와 전망 -한중인문학회 20주년 변화와 모색을 중심으로-
한중인문학연구
2017 .01
-
중국문화 해외진출(走出去) 전략 및 유형 분석
중국문화연구
2015 .05
-
중국식 현대화의 가능성: 고품질 발전은 가능한가?
외국학연구
2024 .06
-
Talents First!: Wu Ta-you and Science Policy Infrastructures in the Republic of China (1927-1970)
한국과학사학회지
2020 .01
-
中國 天津지역 韓僑의 귀환 과정 연구
동양학
2015 .01
-
朱元璋의 ‘中國’은 어디까지였을까? - 주원장 정권의 영토 확장과 중국 인식 -
동양사학연구
2024 .12
-
우크라이나 전쟁과 중국의 입장에 관한 연구
민족연구
2022 .09
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-151-24-02-090084883