메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강동호 (서울과학기술대학교)
저널정보
글로벌영어교육학회 Studies in English Education Studies in English Education 제29권 제1호
발행연도
2024.3
수록면
1 - 20 (20page)
DOI
10.22275/SEE.29.1.01

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The study seeks to answer if there are any differences in the first uptake after receiving two types of feedback (WCF vs. reformulations) and in the second uptake after participating in the whole-class discussion and Q&A session. The participants were thirteen Korean adult EFL learners with low or intermediate English proficiency. The findings indicated that the 2nd uptake was significantly higher than the first one, regardless of feedback type. Regarding the categories of uptake, student uptake primarily occurred in lexis and form in both 1st and 2nd uptake. Secondly, the student uptake in the reformulation condition significantly exceeded that in WCF, regardless of their proficiency levels. In addition, the student uptake was more evident in form and mechanics in the WCF condition, but in lexis and discourse in the reformulation condition. Finally, the intermediate-level students exhibited a higher uptake compared to the low-level students. The intermediate-level students demonstrated relatively higher uptake in lexis, form, and discourse while the low-level students showed more uptake in mechanics. The study concludes with pedagogical implications based on the findings.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0