메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Kenn Arcenal (Korea University)
저널정보
한국영어학회 영어학 영어학 Volume.25
발행연도
2025.1
수록면
98 - 130 (33page)
DOI
10.15738/kjell.25..202501.98

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There has been a consensus among language researchers regarding the apparent advantages of learning lexical chunks. Conventional pedagogies (e.g., memorizing, drilling, input flooding, typographic enhancement) have been utilized in diverse research to determine an effective way of raising students’ awareness of and encoding chunks; however, these practices have produced mixed results. Most of these studies have positioned learners in a passive role and have focused on increasing breadth with retention of forms as the primary goal (Boers and Lindstromberg 2009). Furthermore, the students’ meaningful use of language and feedback from the teacher was rarely considered during the process. Considering how memory works, these conditions could explain the learner’s low retention rate and inconsistencies in the literature. The present exploratory, mixed-methods, classroom-based study veers away from the traditional ways of raising awareness of lexical chunks. It investigates the effects of a usage-driven feedback approach on lexical chunk use and uptake, which emphasizes the value of meaningful production and the importance of receiving feedback in the creation process. Four college students with different proficiency levels in an English- speaking course were investigated for ten weeks. Results from several quantitative and qualitative measures revealed that the function-focused production tasks accompanied by productive feedback from the facilitator and the students led to a significant increase in lexical chunk use.

목차

ABSTRACT
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methodology
4. Results and Discussion
5. Conclusion
6. Limitations and Further Study
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-092315733