지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Internet is an information and communication system in which a lot of people participate and vast information is shared. The information in the internet may be useful or harmful, and unsound information actually exists and its effect to the world is becoming larger and larger. The unsound information includes defamation, invasion of privacy, the infringement of intellectual property right like copyright and trademark right, leakage of business secret as well as obscene and indecent materials. To cope with these side effects of internet, most of the countries, whether developed countries or not, have made or are making laws on information and communication with some limitations to develop and use internet correctly. There are two kinds of limitations; one is a self imposed control by educational institutions, companies related to internet and civil organizations, which has been accepted by developed countries like America and the other a control by government and public organization, which is used by developing countries like Singapore. In this study, judicial liabilities of on-line service providers, therefore, have been studied to solve the torts in the internet.
Three ways have been used to find out whether on-line service providers have the liability on the torts in the cyberspace. One way is to analyze laws, ordinances, precedents and literal materials of the countries like America, Germany and Japan in the view of compared law, for the torts in the cyberspace have a transnational quality and the analysis of one country, therefore, is not sufficient to cover all the torts in the internet. Another is to use materials in the internet, and it has had the time limitation of printed materials overcome and recent laws, ordinances, and precedents reflected in this study. The other is to deal with the torts in civil law, judicial liabilities of on-line service providers and intellectual property right according to an individual country when one country has different laws from others.
The contents of this study are that chapter 1 is the purpose of this study, chapter 2 has a title of Internet communication and On-line service provider, which explains the origin of Internet, the forms of service, and on-line service providers, chapter 3 shows the judicial liabilities of on-line service providers and its jurisdiction, chapter 4 deals with the structure of torts of each country and negligence liabilities in the cyberspace to solve the problems related to torts, chapter 5 has the contents of defamation and the invasion of privacy, chapter 6 shows the infringement of copyright and trademark right, chapter 7 expresses the contents of informationalized privacy and leakage of business secret, chapter 8 is the conclusion, in which the judicial liabilities of on-line service providers to torts in the cyberspace are discussed.
In conclusion, general law system on internet, like America and Germany, must be made immediately against the torts on the cyberspace related to on-line service providers. To activate information society, however, it must not discourage on-line service providers. On-line service providers should not be exonerated from the judicial liabilities if they obey the conditions required by laws.
Three ways have been used to find out whether on-line service providers have the liability on the torts in the cyberspace. One way is to analyze laws, ordinances, precedents and literal materials of the countries like America, Germany and Japan in the view of compared law, for the torts in the cyberspace have a transnational quality and the analysis of one country, therefore, is not sufficient to cover all the torts in the internet. Another is to use materials in the internet, and it has had the time limitation of printed materials overcome and recent laws, ordinances, and precedents reflected in this study. The other is to deal with the torts in civil law, judicial liabilities of on-line service providers and intellectual property right according to an individual country when one country has different laws from others.
The contents of this study are that chapter 1 is the purpose of this study, chapter 2 has a title of Internet communication and On-line service provider, which explains the origin of Internet, the forms of service, and on-line service providers, chapter 3 shows the judicial liabilities of on-line service providers and its jurisdiction, chapter 4 deals with the structure of torts of each country and negligence liabilities in the cyberspace to solve the problems related to torts, chapter 5 has the contents of defamation and the invasion of privacy, chapter 6 shows the infringement of copyright and trademark right, chapter 7 expresses the contents of informationalized privacy and leakage of business secret, chapter 8 is the conclusion, in which the judicial liabilities of on-line service providers to torts in the cyberspace are discussed.
In conclusion, general law system on internet, like America and Germany, must be made immediately against the torts on the cyberspace related to on-line service providers. To activate information society, however, it must not discourage on-line service providers. On-line service providers should not be exonerated from the judicial liabilities if they obey the conditions required by laws.
목차
1. 문제의 제기
2. 정보통신서비스제공자의 법적 지위
3. 불법행위 유형에 따른 정보통신서비스제공자의 책임
4. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (43)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
인터넷 상에서 저작권침해에 따른 온라인서비스 제공자의 책임문제
중재연구
2002 .01
-
Defamation in the Internet : Liability of Internet Service Provider
언론과법
2002 .12
-
인터넷서비스제공자 모니터링의무의 법적 쟁점과 과제
과학기술법연구
2009 .01
-
중국 불법행위법의 최근동향에 관한 연구 : 불법행위책임법(2009년)의 구성과 주요내용을 중심으로
비교사법
2010 .06
-
중국 불법행위법 제정의 현황과 전망
법학논총
2009 .08
-
인터넷에서의 명예훼손과 온라인서비스제공자의 책임
과학기술법연구
2007 .01
-
中国民法典中关于侵权责任的规定和变化
원광법학
2020 .01
-
EU 불법행위법 통일 논의와 동아시아에서의 통일 모색
재산법연구
2010 .01
-
인터넷에서의 표현의 자유와 규제에 대한 비교법제적 연구 : 인터넷 서비스 제공자의 책임성을 중심으로
한국방송학보
2001 .07
-
인터넷상의 명예훼손 : 온라인서비스제공자의 책임을 중심으로
언론과법
2002 .12
-
중국 불법행위의 책임귀속원칙에 관한 연구－불법행위책임법(2009년)의 내용을 중심으로－
중국법연구
2010 .01
-
컴퓨터 소프트웨어의 오류와 민사책임
기업법연구
2006 .03
-
我國的媒体侵權責任与体媒權利保護 : 兼为媒体侵权责任法理论和实践辩解
비교사법
2012 .11
-
사이버 공간(Cyberspace)에서의 권리침해와 관련한 민사법적 고찰
법학연구
2010 .08
-
인터넷 비즈니스 조직의 e-서비스지향성 결정요인과 성과에 관한 연구
한국경영과학회지
2004 .06
-
사이버상의 불법정보 유통에 대한 OSP의 책임
형사정책연구
2005 .03
-
이용자의 불법행위에 대한 온라인서비스제공자의 민사책임
법학연구
2007 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-013789142