메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국기업법학회 기업법연구 기업법연구 제17집
발행연도
2004.6
수록면
323 - 341 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Courts in most states recognize a private right of action for dismissals that jeopardize specific public policy interests of the state. This category of tort liability is called the public policy tort.
The public policy tort, is a specific application of the prima facie tort. The public policy tort permits recovery by a dismissed employee only when the dismissal violates a clear public policy of the state.
The prima facie tort allows recovery if the employer dismissed the employee with malice and without justification. Malice is a legal term of art that means little more than the mental state that motivates harmful conduct in the absence of justification.
Intentional tort principles applicable to these categories permit a plaintiff to recover only by showing that a legally protected right of the plaintiff was harmed by an act of the defendant and that the defendant lacked justification for his act. The public policy tort theory expands the range of circumstances in which an employee may recover without having to establish the employer's conduct or state of mind sufficiently to satisfy traditional tort categories such as intentional interference with contractual relations, intentional infliction of emotional distress, fraudulent misrepresentation, defamation, or invasion of privacy. None of these traditional theories permitted the employee to recover for the dismissal itself. The newer public plicy tort theory permits a dismissed employee to recover for the dismissal itself.
Public policy tort cases require courts to balance the interests of the employee, employer, and society under formula presented in § 870 of the Restatement(Second) of Torts.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 불법행위 요건

Ⅲ. 부당해고에 대한 구제

Ⅳ. 결어

참고문헌

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-014100038