지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Treaty between the Republic of Korea and the People's Republic of China on judicial assistance in civil and commercial matters became effective on April 27, 2005.
The judicial assistance in civil and commercial matters to be provided under this Treaty shall include service of judicial documents, taking of evidence, recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards and provision of legal information or judicial records. The parties of this treaty shall communicate directly through their respectively designated 'central authorities to make or to grant requests for judicial assistance. The central authorities shall be the ministry of court of administration for the Republic of Korea, and the ministry of justice for the Republic of China.
One party shall execute the requests made by the other party for service of judicial documents on persons and the taking of evidence in its territory, including obtaining statements of the parties to the case and testimony of witnesses, taking material and documentary evidence, conducting expert evaluation or judicial inspection, entrusting the public office with inquiries on certain facts, or performing other judicial acts related to the taking of evidence.
Each party shall recognize and enforce the arbitral awards rendered in the territory of the other party in accordance with the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards concluded in New York on June 10, 1958. The provisions of this treaty, in so far as they are in compatible with the Convention mentioned above, shall not apply to the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
According to above described provisions, this study will discuss the legal rules about civil judicial assistance between Korea and China, search for the present situations and problems, and then attempt to suggest some measures for cooperations and facilitations of civil judicial assistance.
At this time, it is necessary to discuss the characteristics and coordinates of relations between two countries, especially to examine the conflicts and the estrangements of legal aspects, and to establish a structural framework exploring some solutions. It is considered that one of such structural framework is the judicial assistance.
The judicial assistance in civil and commercial matters to be provided under this Treaty shall include service of judicial documents, taking of evidence, recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards and provision of legal information or judicial records. The parties of this treaty shall communicate directly through their respectively designated 'central authorities to make or to grant requests for judicial assistance. The central authorities shall be the ministry of court of administration for the Republic of Korea, and the ministry of justice for the Republic of China.
One party shall execute the requests made by the other party for service of judicial documents on persons and the taking of evidence in its territory, including obtaining statements of the parties to the case and testimony of witnesses, taking material and documentary evidence, conducting expert evaluation or judicial inspection, entrusting the public office with inquiries on certain facts, or performing other judicial acts related to the taking of evidence.
Each party shall recognize and enforce the arbitral awards rendered in the territory of the other party in accordance with the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards concluded in New York on June 10, 1958. The provisions of this treaty, in so far as they are in compatible with the Convention mentioned above, shall not apply to the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards.
According to above described provisions, this study will discuss the legal rules about civil judicial assistance between Korea and China, search for the present situations and problems, and then attempt to suggest some measures for cooperations and facilitations of civil judicial assistance.
At this time, it is necessary to discuss the characteristics and coordinates of relations between two countries, especially to examine the conflicts and the estrangements of legal aspects, and to establish a structural framework exploring some solutions. It is considered that one of such structural framework is the judicial assistance.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리에
Ⅱ. 재판상 서류의 송달 공조
Ⅲ. 증거조사 공조
Ⅳ. 중재판정의 승인 및 집행 공조
Ⅴ. 맺으며
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Recent Developments in International Judicial Assistance in Civil or Commercial Matters, in Korea
국제사법연구
1997 .12
-
중국 사법개혁 현황과 시사점
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2014 .12
-
대법원장의 지위와 사법행정권
서강법학
2009 .06
-
조약의 사법심사 : 미국의 경우를 중심으로
법학연구
2009 .06
-
中韓司法協助的現狀及其未來
국제사법연구
2009 .12
-
中國法院承認與執行外國法院判決的實踐考察
국제사법연구
2014 .12
-
중재판정에 대한 사법심사의 계약적 확대
한국무역학회 학술대회
2008 .04
-
중국의 지적재산권 사법심사제도에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2010 .08
-
The Supreme Court`s Endorsement of A Politicized Judiciary : A Philosophical Critique
법학논총
2014 .01
-
중국 사법해석제도에 관한 고찰 : 최고인민법원의 사법해석을 중심으로
비교사법
2008 .06
-
韓國의 司法制度改革의 動向과 課題
동아법학
2007 .08
-
판결서의 구조와 양식에 관한 비교법적 고찰
비교사법
2009 .09
-
중재지인 외국에서 취소된 중재판정의 효력에 관한 고찰
중재연구
2004 .01
-
日帝時代의 司法制度
동아법학
2007 .02
-
日本國憲法상 國民의 司法參加에 관한 硏究
공법학연구
2004 .05
-
1864년 사법개혁 이전의 러시아 사법제도와 사법관료
러시아연구
2009 .01
-
국내중재판정의 강제집행에서 법원의역할에 관한 한미간 비교 고찰- 한국의 중재법과 미국연방중재법을 중심으로 -
중재연구
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-366-018058784