메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

[Articles] Corporate Governance and Welfare System during Industrial Period of East Asian Countries - Comparing Japan, Korea, and Taiwan
Recommendations
Search
Questions

[일반논문] 산업화시기 동아시아국가의 기업지배구조와 복지제도 - 일본, 한국, 대만의 비교

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Journal
Asiatic Reaserch Institute, Korea University The Journal of Asiatic Studies Vol.48 No.2(WN.120) KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2005.6
Pages
253 - 290 (38page)

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
[Articles] Corporate Governance and Welfare System during Industrial Period of East Asian Countries - Comparing Japan, Korea, and Taiwan
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
In this paper, I argue that each welfare system of three East Asian countries, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, has been developed a complementary relationship with its own distinct corporate governance. Japanese stakeholder capitalism created the finance-mediated welfare system. As a result, Japanese corporations and financial institutions has successfully developed mutual interests. On the other hand, while Chaebol-based rent-seeking capitalism in Korea gave priority to the protection of the economic interest of big corporations, Taiwanese familial capitalism has developed a more inclusive welfare system encompassing laborers in small-to middle-sized firms in order to motivate their enthusiasm for work.
Theoretical implications of this study can be summarized as follows. First, welfare system cannot be explained solely by political variables; rather, the features of production regime can help understand better the diversity and the internal dynamics of welfare system. Second, capital does not always oppose the introduction of welfare system, nor does it avoid the burden of paying costs incurred by welfare programs. After taking the expected costs and benefits of welfare system into consideration, if capital believes that the benefits will be greater than or equal to the costs, it support or ar least does nor oppose welfare system. Last but not the least, the correspondence between production regime and welfare system is not determined automatically but mediated by the political force which has the ability to coordinate production regime and welfare system.

Contents

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 이론적 논의

Ⅲ. 동아시아국가의 기업지배구조와 복지제도

Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

References (74)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-015194281