지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The idea of ‘reception’ was adopted from ‘reception-aesthetics Rezeptionsasthetik.’ It refers to the act of reading, understanding and perceiving a work of literature. It is a criticism against traditional artist-centered or formalist perspective and description in art history, through which started the study in literature based on centrality of the reader, who would understand the historical character of art in a reception-aesthetical way. According to reception-aesthetics, a work of literature as a text is only completed through a communicative process of reception by the reader, and has as its objective the analysis of the process of reception, which is the final stage in completing a piece of literature.
The history of ceramics is categorized as ‘industrial art’ within art history, but at the same time, it has attained a somewhat meaningful sphere due to the abundance of material and the development of particular research methodology specific to the genre of ceramics. In addition to the accumulation of original material attained through excavation, the increase of relics that are worthy of analysis and that have been gained from descent through generations and collections, is faster and broader than any other area in art history. Therefore, chronological work is being done as well as primary archeological categorization and interpretation, and it has become a general trend to also study the detailed form and production technology.
However, in the study of ceramics history, we have now passed the stage whereby one would consider ceramics simply as artwork for sentimental appreciation or work of one particular artist-work that delivers a fixed meaning or an object for formative or aesthetic observation. It is a well known fact that since long ago, in the study of ceramics history, only a multilateral approach will allow a three-dimensional interpretation. Recently, quite a few researchers have expressed their agreement to this perspective. However, in the study of ceramic history, the matter of ‘reception’ is difficult to be dealt as an independent research method, and is instead adopted as a complementary methodology. This thesis proposes the expansion of research area from the perspective of ‘reception,’ a: follows: (1) Consumption and circulation-The rebirth of the user / (2) Reflection in the production process: The receptive perspective of the producer / (3) The tradition formed by the recipient: The usage and labelling of ceramics / (4) Collection and appreciation.
Of course, in the study of ceramics history, basic matters such as chronology and form have not been solved and remain debatable. Moreover, materials that need to be solved continuously accumulate. Therefore, there is still a lot to be done in terms of traditional research centered on the production site or producer such as the study of kilns, workshops, sedimentary layers, artisans, materials technology and chronology. However, a multilateral and an in-depth approach to the content can be possible when research centered on the producer is done together with the study from the perspective of the recipient. The wile enthusiasm for the Full Moon Jar during late Chosun period, or the masterpiece exhibitions that expanded this enthusiasm were new traditions made by recipients. Understanding of ceramics focusing on masterpieces made ceramics which were everyday goods for thousands of years, become ‘creation’ and ‘ar work.’ Therefore, an approach to texts such as artifacts that have been handed down across generations and fragments, and to general recipients who circulated and used these ceramics, are very much needed in study of ceramics history.
The history of ceramics is categorized as ‘industrial art’ within art history, but at the same time, it has attained a somewhat meaningful sphere due to the abundance of material and the development of particular research methodology specific to the genre of ceramics. In addition to the accumulation of original material attained through excavation, the increase of relics that are worthy of analysis and that have been gained from descent through generations and collections, is faster and broader than any other area in art history. Therefore, chronological work is being done as well as primary archeological categorization and interpretation, and it has become a general trend to also study the detailed form and production technology.
However, in the study of ceramics history, we have now passed the stage whereby one would consider ceramics simply as artwork for sentimental appreciation or work of one particular artist-work that delivers a fixed meaning or an object for formative or aesthetic observation. It is a well known fact that since long ago, in the study of ceramics history, only a multilateral approach will allow a three-dimensional interpretation. Recently, quite a few researchers have expressed their agreement to this perspective. However, in the study of ceramic history, the matter of ‘reception’ is difficult to be dealt as an independent research method, and is instead adopted as a complementary methodology. This thesis proposes the expansion of research area from the perspective of ‘reception,’ a: follows: (1) Consumption and circulation-The rebirth of the user / (2) Reflection in the production process: The receptive perspective of the producer / (3) The tradition formed by the recipient: The usage and labelling of ceramics / (4) Collection and appreciation.
Of course, in the study of ceramics history, basic matters such as chronology and form have not been solved and remain debatable. Moreover, materials that need to be solved continuously accumulate. Therefore, there is still a lot to be done in terms of traditional research centered on the production site or producer such as the study of kilns, workshops, sedimentary layers, artisans, materials technology and chronology. However, a multilateral and an in-depth approach to the content can be possible when research centered on the producer is done together with the study from the perspective of the recipient. The wile enthusiasm for the Full Moon Jar during late Chosun period, or the masterpiece exhibitions that expanded this enthusiasm were new traditions made by recipients. Understanding of ceramics focusing on masterpieces made ceramics which were everyday goods for thousands of years, become ‘creation’ and ‘ar work.’ Therefore, an approach to texts such as artifacts that have been handed down across generations and fragments, and to general recipients who circulated and used these ceramics, are very much needed in study of ceramics history.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 한국 도자사 연구의 기존관점과 현황
Ⅲ. ‘수용’관점으로 본 연구영역의 확대와 전환
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
「도자사 연구에서 ‘수용(受容)’의 문제」에 대한 질의
김윤정 선생님의 질의에 대한 답변
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
도자사와 교재
미술사학
2005 .08
-
1960 년대 이후 미국의 구상적 도자조각 표현양식에 관한 연구
한국디자인문화학회지
2001 .06
-
한국 산업자기의 발전방안 연구
한국디자인문화학회지
2008 .09
-
디지털기법을 활용한 세라믹 내외장재 연구 및 디자인센터 실내공간 분석
한국실내디자인학회 학술대회논문집
2015 .10
-
한국 도자사 연구 어떻게 할 것인가
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2004 .03
-
음악 수용사 사례연구 －고전 음악청중의 형성 과정
音.樂.學
2008 .01
-
1930년대 『每日申報』에 표출된 도자정책의 시기적 쟁점
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .07
-
환경도자 조형물의 이미지 분석에 관한 연구
한국디자인문화학회지
2006 .03
-
근대기 유럽과 한국의 아르누보 도자 양상에 관한 연구
한국디자인포럼
2009 .01
-
경기도 도자산지의 지역만들기 연구
우리춤과 과학기술
2009 .01
-
Color Experiment in Ceramic : 작가로서의 변
한국색채학회 학술대회
2006 .09
-
근대 유럽에서 한국도자에 대한 인식 변화와 그 배경
한국근현대미술사학
2018 .12
-
국내도자산업 진흥을 위한 디자인 경영전략 연구
한국디자인문화학회지
2008 .12
-
세라믹스 처리된 나일론 직물의 원적외선 방사성능과 보온효과
한국의류학회지
1998 .01
-
한국미술사연구의 과제와 방법론
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2004 .03
-
일제강점기 요지조사와 고려청자 연구의 의미
미술사학
2017 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-650-017048298