지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Lee Saek not only supported but also played a leading role in implementing the policies of King Gongmin-wang, who was well aware of the changes that were happening in and outside of Goryeo and tried to renew almost every aspects of the dynasty by appropriately responding to such changes. Persons whose type that Lee Saek found most ideal were persons who passed the national examination, who were equipped with high level of intelligence and morality, and who were also very loyal to the King. He reasoned that only such persons could turn out as desirable Confucians and become legitimate members of the ruling class(治者). He also thought that only when kings summon those kind of persons they would be able to make the world a better or more ideal place for his subjects, which would be the so-called ‘ideal times (治世)’. He argued that such king would be an ideal king. And he also argued that a world ruled by kings or vassals who did not reach such levels, as a world suffering in the so-called turbulent times(亂世). He labeled kings like Chungsuk-wang, Chungmok-wang and Gongmin-wang as kings who ruled the world well and created the ideal times, while he labeled other kings like Chunghae-wang and Chungjeong-wang as kings who did not rule appropriately and left their subjects to suffer in turbulent times. His opinion of his own time and of the people who were living in it is well mirrored in the biographies he wrote for certain people’s epitaphs which were meant to be put into their graves.
Lee Saek most highly praised Gongmin-wang, among all the kings in the former group. And naturally such praise had very much to do with the fact that he was deeply involved in implementing Gongmin-wang’s policies which intended to promote Neo-Confucianism and prepare adequate systems that would support such ideological inclination. He also hoped that Gongmin-wang’s policies would survive under U-wang’s rule, and his such hopes are mirrored in his evaluation of U-wang’s reign, in which he labeled it as a time of respite. In the early years of U-wang’s reign, his view of such sort made him the perfect person to timely and effectively end the confusion that broke out with the assassination of Gongmin-wang, and to assume the role of leading the task of commemorating the legacy of Gongmin-wang’s ruling. Subsequently, he deeply engaged himself in the politics of the U-wang’s era.
His thoughts were also in line with the thoughts of his contemporary colleagues. It can be verified from the contents of the epitaphs made for Gongmin-wang and his queen Noguk Daejang Gongju, which were created in the third year of U-wang’s reign. Yet in the following days, Lee Saek was politically ruined, in the wake of major political events such as the dethronement of U-wang and Chang-wang, and the foundation of the Joseon dynasty. And a new historical perspective very different from that of Lee Saek, came to be widely accepted, as we can see from the perspectives displayed in 『Goryeosa (Annals of the Goryeo dynasty)』.
Lee Saek most highly praised Gongmin-wang, among all the kings in the former group. And naturally such praise had very much to do with the fact that he was deeply involved in implementing Gongmin-wang’s policies which intended to promote Neo-Confucianism and prepare adequate systems that would support such ideological inclination. He also hoped that Gongmin-wang’s policies would survive under U-wang’s rule, and his such hopes are mirrored in his evaluation of U-wang’s reign, in which he labeled it as a time of respite. In the early years of U-wang’s reign, his view of such sort made him the perfect person to timely and effectively end the confusion that broke out with the assassination of Gongmin-wang, and to assume the role of leading the task of commemorating the legacy of Gongmin-wang’s ruling. Subsequently, he deeply engaged himself in the politics of the U-wang’s era.
His thoughts were also in line with the thoughts of his contemporary colleagues. It can be verified from the contents of the epitaphs made for Gongmin-wang and his queen Noguk Daejang Gongju, which were created in the third year of U-wang’s reign. Yet in the following days, Lee Saek was politically ruined, in the wake of major political events such as the dethronement of U-wang and Chang-wang, and the foundation of the Joseon dynasty. And a new historical perspective very different from that of Lee Saek, came to be widely accepted, as we can see from the perspectives displayed in 『Goryeosa (Annals of the Goryeo dynasty)』.
목차
서론 - 자료 소개와 연구 방법론
1. 묘지명 찬술 동기와 서술의 특징
2. 당대사 인식과 인간관
결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
목은 이색의 비지문에 관한 고찰
어문연구
2006 .01
-
새 자료 고려묘지명 다섯 점 반
역사학보
2008 .06
-
이색의 자아의식과 심리적 갈등 : 우왕 5년기를 중심으로
역사와현실
2006 .12
-
조선시대의 이색 인식과 연구 과제
한국사연구
2012 .12
-
고려시대 묘지명 문화의 전개와 그 자료적 특성
대동문화연구
2006 .01
-
새 고려묘지명 7점
사학연구
2010 .12
-
1358년(공민왕 7) 李穡의 摩尼山 紀行과 塹城壇 醮禮
역사민속학
2013 .07
-
牧隱 李穡의 疾病에 대한 意識과 文學的 表現
동방한문학
2010 .01
-
묘지명 : 짧은 연대기 속의 삶과 사회
한국사 시민강좌
2003 .02
-
麗末鮮初의 茶文化 樣相 硏究
차문화산업학
2017 .01
-
李穡 漢詩의 風格 硏究
동방한문학
2006 .01
-
고려시대 여묘의 시행과 효 윤리 변천과정
역사와실학
2018 .08
-
고려 우왕대 이색의 정치적 위상에 대한 연구
역사와현실
2008 .06
-
목은 이색의 유불교섭사상에 관한 연구
동양철학연구
2006 .01
-
고려시대 묘지명 제작과 ‘알리고 싶은 열망’
대동문화연구
2012 .01
-
조선 태종 11년(1411) 이색 비명을 둘러싼 논쟁의 정치적 성격
도시인문학연구
2009 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-016210312