메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영화학회 영화연구 영화연구 16호
발행연도
2001.2
수록면
69 - 106 (38page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, I propose that national cinema might be discussed as chronotope(Mihail Bakhtin) and performativity(Judith Butler), not as the reflection and construction of national identiy. Why? Because national cinema is the dynamic project and specific practice rather than territorial cultural product of the State. Theorizing the performativity of national cinema, this paper propose the new conception of nation, which is not static and mechanical "Imagined Community" (Benedict Anderson), but "Performative Imagined Community" like gender.
For theorizing "Performative Imagined Community", I combine Homi bhabha"s thought of nation with Judith Butler" s thought of gender. Consequently, the nation has ambivalence and limilnal space which is contradictorily crossed and fissured by the pedagogical and the performative, and is the dynamic and discontinuous process that engender unexpected subjectivity through the citation and iterability by agency. Like gender, nation is the changeable and historical constuct which is not fix and unchangeable entity.
In this paper, I analyze the uncanny family film, Father and Sons (Kwon Cheol-Hwi, 1969) as an example of "Performative Imagined Community." In this film, the relation of family is mimicry of the military culture that was started by Park" s a coup detat and spreaded out widely in South Korea on late 60s. Through the ambivalence of mimcry(Homi Bhabha), I analyze process which this film perform the nation. Like a "Drag", that is parodic mimicry of nation is reavealing inconformity, contradiction, and fissure between nation and state. So couling of Nation and State is not nature, essence, and destiny, but disguised character by modem state and capitalism. And by showing unsuccessful project of Park" s regime that interpellate ideologically nation, this film enact that nation is unexpected mobile agency and that national cinema is practice which go beyond homogenizing and nationalizing project by State.

목차

Ⅰ. 한국영화를 어떻게 말할 것인가?
Ⅱ. 민족영화의 크로노트프와 수행성
Ⅲ. 수행되는 상상의 공동체
Ⅳ. 변종화된 민족의 수행으로서 〈오부자〉의 모방전략
Ⅴ. 민족은 움직이는 거야!
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0