지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
There is much experience on the transfer of undertakings and protection of employment during insolvency proceedings in EU since 1970s, which resulted in the legislation of Council Directive 98/50/EC. The United Kingdom has been accepting EU legislation policy with legal interpretation and also set up the new legislation(TUPE Regulation 2006) to comply with EU Council Directive. This paper reviews EU Council Directive and British legislation mentioned above and proposes some suggestions to reform Korea legislation concerning the transfer of undertakings and protection of employment during insolvency proceedings.
Firstly, We can separate insolvency proceedings into 2 cases roughly and decide where the employment relation shall be transferred to transferee or not. According to the incidents of EU and the United Kingdom, We can build up such legislation as a transfer shall operate so as to terminate the contract of employment only when the transfer occurs during insolvency proceedings which have been opened in relation to the transferor with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor and which are under the supervision of the court.
Secondly, the legislation example of a service provision change is very useful model to protect the employees from the transfer of undertakings. There are complicated problems to test whether a undertaking is assert reliant or labor intensive. The British legislation model of service provision change extends the rage of transfer of undertakings, which helps protecting the employees working in labor intensive fields and intermediate workplace from dismissal.
Thirdly, the British model keeps the unpredictable damage to the employees from occurring caused by variations of contracts through the measure of imposing the duty to provide employees with copies of the text of the agreement and such guidance as employees might reasonably require in order to understand it fully on employer. Korea Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act article29(1) covers the union leader's right to conclusion of collective agreement and the Supreme Court interprets this article as comprehensive right to conclusion of collective agreement without consent of union members. This judicial precedents are confronting much criticism that it puts too much restrictions on union members right to participate. We need to introduce the British legislation example to fortify employees' right to participate and to lessen unnecessary labor disputes following the transfer of undertakings.
Lastly, TUPE regulation 2006 covers duty to inform and consult employee representatives. The regulation enacts employers' duty to inform employee representatives the fact that the transfer is to take place, the date of the transfer, the reasons for it, the legal, economic and social implications of the transfer, the measures which employers envisage in connection with the transfer and so on. The employers also shall consult employee representatives about transfer. The court can order employers to pay appropriate compensation when employers fail to inform and consult. These measures provide employees with opportunity to copy with the transfer relevantly, which enable them to make proper decisions concerning the transfer. Korea Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act just covers duty of hearing from the labor union and employee representatives when the transfer of undertaking occurs and does not enact details of hearing, which could make this procedure ineffective. It is necessary to introduce this kind of article on the employers' duty to inform and to consult employee representatives.
Firstly, We can separate insolvency proceedings into 2 cases roughly and decide where the employment relation shall be transferred to transferee or not. According to the incidents of EU and the United Kingdom, We can build up such legislation as a transfer shall operate so as to terminate the contract of employment only when the transfer occurs during insolvency proceedings which have been opened in relation to the transferor with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor and which are under the supervision of the court.
Secondly, the legislation example of a service provision change is very useful model to protect the employees from the transfer of undertakings. There are complicated problems to test whether a undertaking is assert reliant or labor intensive. The British legislation model of service provision change extends the rage of transfer of undertakings, which helps protecting the employees working in labor intensive fields and intermediate workplace from dismissal.
Thirdly, the British model keeps the unpredictable damage to the employees from occurring caused by variations of contracts through the measure of imposing the duty to provide employees with copies of the text of the agreement and such guidance as employees might reasonably require in order to understand it fully on employer. Korea Trade Union and Labor Relations Adjustment Act article29(1) covers the union leader's right to conclusion of collective agreement and the Supreme Court interprets this article as comprehensive right to conclusion of collective agreement without consent of union members. This judicial precedents are confronting much criticism that it puts too much restrictions on union members right to participate. We need to introduce the British legislation example to fortify employees' right to participate and to lessen unnecessary labor disputes following the transfer of undertakings.
Lastly, TUPE regulation 2006 covers duty to inform and consult employee representatives. The regulation enacts employers' duty to inform employee representatives the fact that the transfer is to take place, the date of the transfer, the reasons for it, the legal, economic and social implications of the transfer, the measures which employers envisage in connection with the transfer and so on. The employers also shall consult employee representatives about transfer. The court can order employers to pay appropriate compensation when employers fail to inform and consult. These measures provide employees with opportunity to copy with the transfer relevantly, which enable them to make proper decisions concerning the transfer. Korea Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act just covers duty of hearing from the labor union and employee representatives when the transfer of undertaking occurs and does not enact details of hearing, which could make this procedure ineffective. It is necessary to introduce this kind of article on the employers' duty to inform and to consult employee representatives.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 도산절차와 근로관계 승계에 관한 EU의 입법지침
Ⅲ. 영국의 입법 현황
Ⅳ. 우리 법제에 대한 시사점 및 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사업이전과 해고의 정당한 이유 : 영국의 입법과 해석론을 중심으로
노동법논총
2014 .04
-
기업 간 전출 시의 징계권 행사에 대한 고찰
법학연구
2019 .08
-
외주위탁사업의 이전과 근로관계의 승계 : 영국의 입법론과 시사점
노동법학
2012 .03
-
사업의 인수ㆍ양도ㆍ합병과 고용승계
법학논총
2005 .02
-
사용자 지시권의 내재적 한계와 제한의 결정원리
노동법학
2007 .06
-
도산절차에서의 개별적 근로관계에 관한 검토
노동법포럼
2010 .04
-
노동법상 근로자ㆍ사용자 개념 확대를 둘러싼 쟁점과 입법적 과제
노동법학
2014 .03
-
회사분할과 근로관계의 승계
노동법포럼
2011 .04
-
使用者責任과 求償權 및 逆求償權에 관한 考察
동아법학
2010 .08
-
전직에 의한 조합활동상의 불이익
노동법학
2004 .12
-
사용자의 지시에 대한 근로자의 대응과 그 효과
강원법학
2008 .06
-
간접고용하의 부당노동행위 사례와 보호방안
노동법논총
2010 .08
-
사업양도와 근로관계 승계의 방법
법학연구
2000 .12
-
기업변동에 따른 퇴직금의 격차에 대한 법적 문제 － 취업규칙에 의해 규율되는 퇴직금제도를 중심으로 －
경영법률
2007 .01
-
헌법상 노동권 소고(小考) : 개별근로관계 사례를 중심으로
노동법연구
2007 .06
-
사업장 내 정신건강문제의 법적 고찰
노동법연구
2017 .09
-
학력위조와 근로계약의 효력
노동법학
2009 .03
-
공무원의 노동관계법상 지위에 관한 연구
노동법포럼
2010 .04
-
사내도급 고용관계에서 부당노동행위 책임 - 미국 공동사용자 원리와 비교
노동법포럼
2017 .07
-
노조의 존립ㆍ자주성의 보호와 그 모순
노동법학
2006 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0