메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
행정법이론실무학회 행정법연구 行政法硏究 第20號
발행연도
2008.4
수록면
91 - 114 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The Korea Telecommunications Business Act provides for prohibition of various business practices including violations of user‘s interest under the title, “Prohibited Practices”. The enforcement decree of the Act also provides for the types and the criteria of the prohibited practices. The regulation of the prohibited practices under those legal instruments may be criticized from the viewpoints of clearness of the criteria and reasonableness of the underlying policies. First, the drafting method of relevant provisions on the Act and its enforcement decree creates large rooms for a variety of confusions in their actual implementation. Second, the conceptional confusion with respect to the user’s interest in the relevant provisions misguides enforcement of the prohibition of violations of user‘s interest under the Act. The practices provided for as violations of user’s interest in the relevant provisions should only include practices which directly harm interests of users, not those which restrain competitions in the relevant markets. Third, the enforcement records of the Act show that the telecommunication regulation authority has erroneously taken per se illegal approaches to various types of prohibited practices such as undue discriminations of users and telecommunication service tying practices. Those practices should be deemed illegal only when they are proved anti-competitive or unfairly harm user‘s interests. Enacting an enforcement guidelines can help to improve the enforcement practices. Fourth, the last type of the violations of user’s interest under the enforcement decree of the Act should not be used as a ground for prohibiting business practices since no subordinate administrative rules which specify its types or criteria has been enacted as required by the decree. Fifth, remedies and collective measures for the prohibited practices should be proportionate to the seriousness and the effect of the practices in question and the requirements and controlling factors for each type of remedies and collective measures should be clearly articulated in relevant legislations or enforcement guidelines.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 전기통신사업법상 금지행위 규제의 연혁 및 현행 규제체계
Ⅲ. 전기통신사업법상 금지행위 규정방식의 특징 및 대안
Ⅳ. 전기통신사업법상 이용자이익 저해행위 규제의 문제점
Ⅴ. 전기통신사업법상 이용자이익 저해행위 규제의 개선방안
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0