메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국슬라브유라시아학회 슬라브학보 슬라브학보 제19권 1호
발행연도
2004.6
수록면
249 - 269 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study is to make assessment of the political activities of F.Palacky from the standpoint of Austroslavism after the collapse of the Metternichsystem(1815-1848).
Palacky, the historian and politician, influenced the course of the history Czech in middle of 19 century. He believed that the Slaves in Austria should not take part in the Provisional Parliament for the Unification under the Grossdeutschtum. In his Rejected Letter to Frankfurt(=Absagebrief nach Frankfurt), he insisted that the ethnic conflicts in Austria be resolved. He believed that the ethnic conflicts might trig the political movements to topple down the Absolute Monarchy System. The Danube Monarchy was such ethnically heterogeneous that the minority of German dominated over the larger number of Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians and Poles.
In these political circumstances, Palacky introduced the Federalism of Austria as the solution. He believed that the Federalism was the only solution to solve the inequality between the Germans and the Slavs. He worked hard to convince the peoples that his idea was the only way to solve the conflicts between the Germans and the Slavs.
However, his idea was rejected by most German politicians, who wanted to maintain their dominancy in Austria. Consequently, the Imperial Parliament in Kremsier was resolved, and Kaiser Franz Joseph I brought the Neoabsolutism in Austria, leaving the ethnic conflicts unsolved in the Danube Monarchy.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 거절편지의 내용
Ⅲ. 거절편지에 대한 독일정치가들의 반응과 팔라츠키의 대응책
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-309-018828147