지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of the study is to make a new inquiry into the court's method of investigation about the standing to sue as an requirement for administrative litigation of Korea.
The standing to sue is an important procedural requirement in administrative litigation, which determines whether citizens can protect their right or interest via administrative litigation. However, the standing to sue in administrative litigation is recognized by the court's investigation. Consequently, whether the standing to sue is recognized actually depends on the court's method of investigation.
When comparing the court's method of investigation about the procedural requirements in administrative litigation with that in civil litigation, unlike civil litigation it is possible for the court to investigate officially(von Amts wegen) in administrative litigation in consideration of public interest. Like this, in principle the court's authority of investigating officially is possible in administrative litigation for the sake of public interest. This aspect distinguishes between civil and administrative litigation.
Recently, there have been some court rulings in administration litigation that assign the burden of proof to citizens as plaintiff, when the court investigated the standing to sue as an procedural requirement. This paper examined whether the trend of these court rulings complys with the legal system of Korea including the constitution, the civil and administrative litigation.
The conclusion is that the court's method of investigation about the standing to sue in administrative litigation should be appropriate for the constitutional right of access to the courts and the essence, purpose, and procedural principles of administrative litigation of Korea.
The standing to sue is an important procedural requirement in administrative litigation, which determines whether citizens can protect their right or interest via administrative litigation. However, the standing to sue in administrative litigation is recognized by the court's investigation. Consequently, whether the standing to sue is recognized actually depends on the court's method of investigation.
When comparing the court's method of investigation about the procedural requirements in administrative litigation with that in civil litigation, unlike civil litigation it is possible for the court to investigate officially(von Amts wegen) in administrative litigation in consideration of public interest. Like this, in principle the court's authority of investigating officially is possible in administrative litigation for the sake of public interest. This aspect distinguishes between civil and administrative litigation.
Recently, there have been some court rulings in administration litigation that assign the burden of proof to citizens as plaintiff, when the court investigated the standing to sue as an procedural requirement. This paper examined whether the trend of these court rulings complys with the legal system of Korea including the constitution, the civil and administrative litigation.
The conclusion is that the court's method of investigation about the standing to sue in administrative litigation should be appropriate for the constitutional right of access to the courts and the essence, purpose, and procedural principles of administrative litigation of Korea.
목차
Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 행정소송에서의 소송요건으로서의 원고적격
Ⅲ. 민사소송에서의 소송요건에 대한 법원의 조사방법
Ⅳ. 행정소송에서의 법원의 조사방법에 고려할 제 요소
Ⅴ. 행정소송에서의 원고적격에 대한 법원의 조사방법
Ⅵ. 결어
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
행정소송에서의 원고적격 : 기존 4개 학설의 의의를 중심으로
행정법연구
2008 .12
-
환경행정소송에서의 원고적격
행정법연구
2011 .08
-
당사자소송 - 소송의 형태를 중심으로 -
원광법학
2010 .01
-
환경행정소송과 원고적격 : 대법원 2012. 7. 5. 선고 2011두13187 판결의 비판을 중심으로
한양법학
2013 .02
-
客觀訴訟의 법리 - 일본에서의 논의를 중심으로
원광법학
2009 .01
-
행정소송에서의 기본적 사실관계 동일성의 의의 : 형사소송과의 비교를 중심으로
행정법연구
2016 .08
-
환경상 이익이 관련된 지역과 원고적격
행정법연구
2012 .08
-
환경행정소송에서의 원고적격
법학논총
2018 .01
-
行政訴訟에서의 調停의 可能性과 限界
행정법연구
2007 .05
-
공익소송의 입법론적 고찰
원광법학
2013 .01
-
‘낙동강 취수장 판결’로 살펴본 환경행정소송상의 원고적격 확대의 문제 : 대법원 2010. 4. 15. 선고 2007두16127 판결에 대한 평석
한양법학
2010 .08
-
미국 행정소송과 원고적격 : 법적 권리에서 사실상의 손상(injury in fact)으로
행정법연구
2014 .07
-
국가기관 간의 분쟁 해결 수단으로서 항고소송의 한계
서강법률논총
2019 .08
-
한국 환경행정소송의 최근 동향과 쟁점, 향후 과제
환경법과 정책
2011 .11
-
行政訴訟에 있어서의 審理
한양법학
2004 .12
-
중국 행정소송의 유형에 관한 고찰
공법학연구
2019 .05
-
행정소송법 개정에 관한 소고 : 대법원과 법무부 개정안의 상호비교를 중심으로
행정법연구
2007 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-363-002627464