지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Common Article 1 of the two 1966 international covenants on human rights, 「International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights」(hereinafter referred to as "Social Rights Covenant") and 「International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights」(hereinafter referred to as "Civil Rights Covenant"), in which all paragraphs of both articles are exactly same, provides protection of the so-called right of self-determination. Traditionally, the right of self-determination under international law has been discussed and understood to mean peoples' rights of political independence closely linked with the idea of decolonization. Article 1 of the 「Civil Rights Covenant」 has generally been recognized as providing the right of self-determination in this political aspect.
Unliked the above mentioned classical right of self-determination under the 「Civil Rights Covenant」, the right of self-determination in the Article 1 of the 「Social Rights Covenant」 has recently been interpreted to mean economic, social and cultural aspects. Accordingly, the precise meanings and details of the rights of self-determination in the common Article 1, I think, should be differently understood and interpreted. However, the right of self-determination in the Article 1 of the 「Social Rights Covenant」, namely economic, social and cultural right of self-determination, has not been sufficiently and systematically analyzed. Consequently, the legal meaning, status and details of the right of self-determination in the Article 1 of the 「Social Rights Covenant」 still remain ambiguous and vague.
This paper, based on this recognition, discussed what the meaning and details of the right of self-determination in economic, social and cultural aspects are as well as what its legal status is, with special reference to the right to development which has recently been discussed as the core of the economic, social and cultural right of self-determination in the Article 1 of the 「Social Rights Covenant」. To conclude, the author suggests the party states of the covenant including Korea, as the substantial responsible bodies, take appropriate and effective national measures to protect the right to development which is allegedly the core of the right self-determination in the Article 1 of the 「Social Rights Covenant」.
Unliked the above mentioned classical right of self-determination under the 「Civil Rights Covenant」, the right of self-determination in the Article 1 of the 「Social Rights Covenant」 has recently been interpreted to mean economic, social and cultural aspects. Accordingly, the precise meanings and details of the rights of self-determination in the common Article 1, I think, should be differently understood and interpreted. However, the right of self-determination in the Article 1 of the 「Social Rights Covenant」, namely economic, social and cultural right of self-determination, has not been sufficiently and systematically analyzed. Consequently, the legal meaning, status and details of the right of self-determination in the Article 1 of the 「Social Rights Covenant」 still remain ambiguous and vague.
This paper, based on this recognition, discussed what the meaning and details of the right of self-determination in economic, social and cultural aspects are as well as what its legal status is, with special reference to the right to development which has recently been discussed as the core of the economic, social and cultural right of self-determination in the Article 1 of the 「Social Rights Covenant」. To conclude, the author suggests the party states of the covenant including Korea, as the substantial responsible bodies, take appropriate and effective national measures to protect the right to development which is allegedly the core of the right self-determination in the Article 1 of the 「Social Rights Covenant」.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 국제법상 自決權의 개념
Ⅲ. 경제적ㆍ사회적ㆍ문화적 측면의 自決權 관념의 등장
Ⅳ. 경제적ㆍ사회적ㆍ문화적 自決權의 주요 내용으로서 發展權
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
국제인권규약 가입에 따른 중국헌법상 기본권조항의 현황과 개선논의 분석
중앙법학
2010 .09
-
경제적·사회적 및 문화적 권리에 관한 국제인권규약연구
법학논집
1997 .01
-
국제인권법의 국내 적용과 사법부 : 결사의 자유와 관련된 판결 · 결정 검토를 중심으로
노동법학
2018 .03
-
Alien Registration Law of Japan and the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights
국제법학회논총
1986 .12
-
國際的 人權章典인 유엔人權規約 : 「A規約」과 「B規約」의 比較硏究
인도법논총
1996 .08
-
THE CONSTITUTONAL MEANING OF THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS
법학연구
1990 .12
-
국제연합 사회권위원회와 인권이사회를 통한 주거권 보장
인권과 정의
2019 .01
-
대한민국의 「 시민적 및 정치적 권리에 관한 국제규약 」 제 14 조 제 5 항 유보 검토
서울국제법연구
2001 .12
-
국내적 인권과 국제적 인권? : 인권 개념의 이중성에 대한 소고
한양법학
2011 .08
-
國際人權規約의 特色과 問題點
국제법학회논총
1973 .06
-
복지권의 구성과 성격
한국사회복지학
2003 .12
-
자기결정권에 대한 법철학적 고찰
법학논집
2015 .01
-
국제인권조약의 국내적 적용 : 주요국의 적용사례에 관한 비교법적 고찰
법학연구
2013 .03
-
헌법상 자기결정권의 의의
법학연구
2005 .11
-
농인의 언어권에 대한 법적 보장 : 한국수어법 제정을 중심으로
중앙법학
2015 .06
-
经济和社会权利的可裁决性
법학연구
2009 .12
-
인권개념의 ‘세대’적 접근에 대한 비판적 고찰
법학연구
2018 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-360-002240006