메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이덕기 (경북대학교)
저널정보
한국어문학회 어문학 語文學 第107輯
발행연도
2010.3
수록면
295 - 322 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In march 1941, Hyundae-gukjang had brilliantly made its first step under the flag of the establishment of ‘Gukmin-yeonguk’. As a successor of Gukyeonjwa and Gukyesulyeonguhoi, it criticized conventional theatre companies mainly aimed for profits and advocated the true national art. Hungyongang and Bukjindae were two of the most representative theatre companies for its Gukminyeonguk, planned with great ambitions. Their effects, however, did not seem very huge, only to result in the withdrawal of some members and serious financial problems. Most of all, there were a clear contradiction and a dillema in Hyundae-gukjang just like in former Gukyeonjwa when Hyundae-gukjang tried to professionalize shinguk[one kind of Josoen modern drama]. Gukyeonjwa had been suspicious that local performances were necessary, even if it clearly had clarified the purpose to be a professional theatre, taking a belligerent position to many of the past successful theatre companies. Hyundae-gukjang as well tried to discriminate itself from other successful companies and to raise its status in the theatrical world. This policy contributed to financial problems from which the theatre company attempted to escape by depending on ‘a possible help from others’. As Gukyeonjwa had expected to get financial aids hoping for an appearance of a generous benefactor who would have great interest in plays, Hyundaegukjang wanted the Japanese Empire to financially support itself; however, it never happened, which ultimately led the theatre company to turn its way into popular repertories. In other words, the company decided to operate with its own efforts, also collaborating with some of the most successful theatre companies of those days, such as Sungbo-akukdae, Yakcho-gagukdan. Among the main repertory pieces were Ham-Seduk’s popular works and others’. In brief, Hyundea-gukjang’s early action was failed in professionalizing shinguk. With vague hope of external support, it was impossible. ‘Gukmin-yeonguk’ was sort method for external support and no more. Hyundea-gukjang’s change of direction means Gukmin-yoenguk they advanced was failed, and Hyudae-gukjang’s leadership and status were damaged seriously.

목차

1. 들어가며
2. 극연좌의 실패, 현대극장의 불길한 출발
3. 직업극단으로서 현대극장의 딜레마
4. 대중적 레퍼토리로의 전환과 그 의미
5. 맺으며
참고문헌
[Abstract]

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-810-002143927