지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Sweden is commonly known as a strong but small country, a social democratic welfare state, a third way or a mixed economy, a country of Robin Hood, etc. for its various characteristics. From a political and economic point of view, the country is characterized as a state-led society, a mixed economy, a third way between capitalism and socialism, a country of Robin Hood (advanced tax system and welfare for redistribution) or a country with many people falling into the middle class. Besides, Sweden is clearly serving as a model of upholding an equal society. It may be viewed that the Swedish society could put an emphasis on equality at the national level because it utilized its status as a neutral country well. In other words, Sweden was able to reflect not only its domestic matters of interest but also post-materialist values such as justice, equality and freedom on its policy priorities amid the situation where national security issues including wars were not matters of concern due to its neutrality.
It is my view that the Swedish society's strength, among others, is a social consensus on human rights, equality and justice already in place. That is, there is a social consensus needed to build “a society where people live together” and “a society that people should make together”. It is easy to look at the Swedish model simply from an economic perspective and to say the model's characteristic is an agreement between Labor and Management. However, it should be kept in mind that the model contains a social consensus on “distribution through growth”. Such consensus could be possible on the basis of sharing values for a strong society or an equal society.
Sweden has traditionally had a unique political culture based on compromise and moderation. This led to a struggle for female suffrage and then further to a struggle for gender equality in public life (Hyen-Kuen Lee, 1999: 143-149). A clue to understand Swedish gender model and gender politics can be found in the country's historical tradition (Eduards, 1991: 167-169). Yeoman culture, education, strong organizations related to popular movements and features found in the economic development process are the major factors that have changed Sweden into what it is today, a society in which women participate. It is notable that they are in line with the historical background of Swedish democratic civic education.
Democracy is maintained and developed by the interest of democratic citizens in upholding democratic values. Considering this, the 2010 local elections should be the opportunity for the political arena and the civil society to look at conflicts facing Korea, underdeveloped country in terms of politics, reflect on themselves and design for the future. It is my hope that the tragedy in 2009 stated above can offer the historic opportunity for the Korean democracy to further develop from 2010 and on. However, this wouldn't be easy in reality. Above all, it is critical to share the values for turning the society divided into two into a society of coexistence and symbiosis. How much the citizens are awakened and how much they study determines how strong or weak the foundation for democracy is. This implies that democratic civic education should go to the direction towards education on universal values needed to build a trusted society. It is because the level of social development is in proportion to the level of trust in the society.
In summary, the important lesson learnt from Sweden's experience is that only when the three things, making a social consensus on a society where people live together", providing the right education and reform systems, are in harmony, we can achieve what we want. In comparing Sweden and Korea, I realized that before discussing institutional systems, we should go back to ask a basic question to ourselves - Why we should go toward the society where we live together. In addition, we should not forget the simple truth that How much the citizens are awakened and how much they study determines how strong or weak the foundation for democracy is.
It is my view that the Swedish society's strength, among others, is a social consensus on human rights, equality and justice already in place. That is, there is a social consensus needed to build “a society where people live together” and “a society that people should make together”. It is easy to look at the Swedish model simply from an economic perspective and to say the model's characteristic is an agreement between Labor and Management. However, it should be kept in mind that the model contains a social consensus on “distribution through growth”. Such consensus could be possible on the basis of sharing values for a strong society or an equal society.
Sweden has traditionally had a unique political culture based on compromise and moderation. This led to a struggle for female suffrage and then further to a struggle for gender equality in public life (Hyen-Kuen Lee, 1999: 143-149). A clue to understand Swedish gender model and gender politics can be found in the country's historical tradition (Eduards, 1991: 167-169). Yeoman culture, education, strong organizations related to popular movements and features found in the economic development process are the major factors that have changed Sweden into what it is today, a society in which women participate. It is notable that they are in line with the historical background of Swedish democratic civic education.
Democracy is maintained and developed by the interest of democratic citizens in upholding democratic values. Considering this, the 2010 local elections should be the opportunity for the political arena and the civil society to look at conflicts facing Korea, underdeveloped country in terms of politics, reflect on themselves and design for the future. It is my hope that the tragedy in 2009 stated above can offer the historic opportunity for the Korean democracy to further develop from 2010 and on. However, this wouldn't be easy in reality. Above all, it is critical to share the values for turning the society divided into two into a society of coexistence and symbiosis. How much the citizens are awakened and how much they study determines how strong or weak the foundation for democracy is. This implies that democratic civic education should go to the direction towards education on universal values needed to build a trusted society. It is because the level of social development is in proportion to the level of trust in the society.
In summary, the important lesson learnt from Sweden's experience is that only when the three things, making a social consensus on a society where people live together", providing the right education and reform systems, are in harmony, we can achieve what we want. In comparing Sweden and Korea, I realized that before discussing institutional systems, we should go back to ask a basic question to ourselves - Why we should go toward the society where we live together. In addition, we should not forget the simple truth that How much the citizens are awakened and how much they study determines how strong or weak the foundation for democracy is.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 스웨덴 정치문화의 특성과 가치 공유
Ⅲ. 소통문화와 참여정치: 스웨덴 시민교육, 선거 그리고 정치발전의 경험
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
스웨덴 복지국가 모델의 형성과 위기
한국사회과학연구
2006 .06
-
An Area Study on Sweden in the Perspective of Tourism Promotion
여행학연구
2000 .06
-
스웨덴의 시민정치교육과 정당의 역할
유럽연구
2014 .03
-
제주형 평화모델 정립에 관한 시론 : 경제적 불평등 해소를 위한 경제적 복지공동체 대안을 중심으로
21세기정치학회보
2006 .09
-
민주화 이후 정치적 위기와 대응: 한국과 태국의 비교론적 함의
동남아시아연구
2008 .01
-
스웨덴 교육과정에 나타난 민주주의 이념분석 : 1940-60년대와 1990년대 이후
평생학습사회
2014 .02
-
Sweden’s Active Labor Market Policy
노동연구
1991 .12
-
명예살인을 둘러싼 스웨덴의 논쟁과 정책적 대응
국제정치논총
2011 .06
-
제도화된 여성운동의 가능성과 한계 : 스웨덴의 페미니스트 정당(Feminist Initiative)을 중심으로
국제정치논총
2007 .06
-
『周易』과 탈현대 사회의 비전
한국사회과학연구
2012 .06
-
스웨덴 교육체제 및 교육법제의 내용과 특징
한양법학
2015 .05
-
젠더와 스웨덴의 여성복지 체제
사회이론
2002 .12
-
[일반논문] 중국 근현대의 국가, 사회 그리고 비밀결사
아세아연구
2003 .10
-
1990년대 이후 한국 여성노동의 현황과 성평등 과제
시민사회와 NGO
2020 .01
-
The "Centralization" of Japanese Society in the World Society and its Social Effects - The Present Condition and Validity of the Theory of Social Development -
아세아연구
1988 .01
-
중국의 스모그에 대한 사회학적 분석 : 복합위험사회론적 시각
동북아 문화연구
2014 .12
-
한국 민주주의의 이행과 공고화 과정 분석
사회과학연구
2006 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
여성 선진국의 여성의 고위정책직 실태와 확대방안
윤용희
정치정보연구
2001
.12
사회전기로 본 이성형의 라틴아메리카 지역학
이남섭
라틴아메리카연구
2013
.05
한국과 스웨덴의 여성의원의 실태와 확대방안 : 국회의원과 지방의회의원을 중심으로
하세헌
,
윤이화
社會科學
2005
.12
경제 위기와 건강 : 한국사회의 변화에 대한 묘사적 연구
정혜주
,
변진옥
,
이광현
아세아연구
2011
.06
유럽 프랑스어권 지역의 프랑스어 및 다언어 상황에 대한 연구 : 벨기에, 스위스, 룩셈부르크를 중심으로
정남모
국제지역학논총
2008
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-349-003094692