메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第115輯
발행연도
2010.9
수록면
199 - 221 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Corporal punishment was generally recognized as a necessity for children’s education in the ancient western world. This attitude was based on their view of education. They thought that the object of education was to hand down the hereditary intellectual traditions to next generation and that strict ‘gymnastic of mind’ was necessary for that. They were not considerate of children’s psychology or educational effectiveness. They thought that children were irrational and that in order to instruct them effectively, they should use strict punishment, not rational discourse.
But in reality teacher’s corporal punishment was restricted for several reasons. During the Roman Empire, public education which central or municipal governments would have supervised was not established and free paying system for teachers prevailed over public appointments of teachers which some municipal governments administered. Teachers competed with each other for securing of pupils. Their social and economical positions, therefore, grew worse in the later Roman empire.
From the level of grammar education, especially in rhetoric education, the pupils were almost from aristocratic families unlike the pupils of elementary schools. The parents of aristocratic families wanted their children to be treated with dignity in the classroom as honorable citizen in the future. In such a social environment teachers could not have punished their pupils according to their educational convictions.

목차

1. 서언
2. 체벌에 대한 견해와 실태
3. 체벌 문제와 로마 사회
4. 결어

참고문헌 (18)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-374-003694051