메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국역사연구회 역사와현실 역사와현실 제53권
발행연도
2004.9
수록면
187 - 219 (33page)

이용수

DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로
최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The execution of Hogging as a punishment for 'criminals in the 1910's has often been referred to as a symlbol of the "military governance" during the initial stage of the Japanese colonialist rule. However, there are only a few researches on the corporal punishment itself and its execution.The Hogging was, in fact, not introduced by Japanese rulers but had been administered during the Chosun(朝鮮) dynasty. Japanese otlicials, who were actual rulers of Korea since 1905, chose to control the colonial people by utilizing the feudal practice of the old order they had destroyed.Japanese imperialists had already tried the method of using premorden systems of colony to their eneLs in Taiwan(臺灣). They maintained the Hogging penalty of China in Taiwan, despite the opposition from home and abroad. It set a precedent for the Korean rule, In the colonial Chosun, Hogging was institutionalized in the Chosun Flogging Act(朝鮮笞刑令) in 1912. The Act was neither universal in that it only governed the Korean people not Japanese nor a part of the established penal law. Flogging was an interchangeable punishment for any violations worth imprisonment under three months or fine less than 100 won.Japanese rulers cited two reasons for keeping the corporal punishment in Chosun. First, Hogging was effective for preventing crimes. Second, by replacing imprisonment, it saves costs involving management and maintenance of prisons.
Actually, corporal punishment was largely executed and constantly took up 40% of all punishments. This shows that, despite the guise of modernization, Japanese imperialists possessed feudal perspective for the people and saw them as their subjects,However, when Saito Makoto(齊藤實), an assimilationist, came to Chosun as the governor-general just after the massive March 1st uprising in 1919's, his team in the Government-General abolished aorporal punishment, under the banner of harmonizing climinal laws of Japan and the colony. But, the gesture was only alleviation of the colonialist rule not the change of its nature. Eliminating corporal punishment was nothing more than a methodical variation in the rule.

목차

머리말

1.한말 형벌제도의 변화와 태장형

2.조선태형령의 시행과정과 내용

3.태형처벌의 논리와 실제

4.태형제도 개편논의와 페지과정

맺음말

Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014303025