지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Ever since Beccaria claimed abolishment of the death penalty for the first time in the world, there have been heated debates for and against the death penalty. In other words, there is tight conflict concerning prevention of heinous crimes, victims' emotions, possibility of misjudgment and respect of people's lives.
In Korea, the press urges the death penalty based on public opinion surveys every time a heinous crime occurs. There are currently around 60 countries around the world that maintain the death penalty, including the United States, China and Japan, around 120 countries have abolished the death penalty, including Germany, the United Kingdom and France, and there are around 30 'actual abolishment countries' that maintain the penalty but have not actually executed the death penalty for 10 or more years. Korea has not executed the death penalty since December, 1997, and is therefore an actual abolishment country.
Overall, the tendency of countries all over the world is to reduce execution of the death penalty by sentencing criminals on death row to life in prison. However, public opinion surveys in Korea show people are generally for the death penalty. It is considered constitutional even by the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court. However, a point to focus on is that the Constitutional Court judged, "If there is hardly any need for prevention of crime through a death penalty due to changing times or we reach a time when the people do not feel the need for the penalty, the death penalty will immediately be abolished."
Korea's debate on the death penalty has been focused mostly on the law and philosophy, and neglected victims' families who actually suffer damages and human rights of prison wards who actually carry out the execution. Therefore, this study reexamined legal evidence of the death penalty which was insufficient in existing debates, and crime prevention effects of the death penalty, and especially attempted to solve the death penalty problem in terms of the victim and crime prevention.
In Korea, the press urges the death penalty based on public opinion surveys every time a heinous crime occurs. There are currently around 60 countries around the world that maintain the death penalty, including the United States, China and Japan, around 120 countries have abolished the death penalty, including Germany, the United Kingdom and France, and there are around 30 'actual abolishment countries' that maintain the penalty but have not actually executed the death penalty for 10 or more years. Korea has not executed the death penalty since December, 1997, and is therefore an actual abolishment country.
Overall, the tendency of countries all over the world is to reduce execution of the death penalty by sentencing criminals on death row to life in prison. However, public opinion surveys in Korea show people are generally for the death penalty. It is considered constitutional even by the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court. However, a point to focus on is that the Constitutional Court judged, "If there is hardly any need for prevention of crime through a death penalty due to changing times or we reach a time when the people do not feel the need for the penalty, the death penalty will immediately be abolished."
Korea's debate on the death penalty has been focused mostly on the law and philosophy, and neglected victims' families who actually suffer damages and human rights of prison wards who actually carry out the execution. Therefore, this study reexamined legal evidence of the death penalty which was insufficient in existing debates, and crime prevention effects of the death penalty, and especially attempted to solve the death penalty problem in terms of the victim and crime prevention.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 사형제도의 현황
Ⅲ. 사형의 존·폐론
Ⅳ. 사형제도의 개선방안
Ⅴ. 현행 사형제도에 대한 정책적 제안
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문과 연관된 판례 (1)
-
대법원 1995. 1. 13. 선고 94도2662 판결
가. 사형은 인간의 생명 자체를 영원히 박탈하는 냉엄한 극형으로서 그 생명을 존치시킬 수 없는 부득이한 경우에 한하여 적용되어야 할 궁극의 형벌이므로, 사형을 선택함에 있어서는 범행의 동기, 태양, 죄질, 범행의 수단, 잔악성, 결과의 중대성, 피해자의 수, 피해감정, 범인의 연령, 전과, 범행 후의 정황, 범인의 환경, 교육 및 생육과정
자세히 보기
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
사형폐지론의 입장에서 바라본 사형제도
한양법학
2010 .05
-
동북아시아 3국의 사형제도에 대한 비교 고찰 -정치·사회·문화적 측면을 중심으로-
원광법학
2008 .01
-
사형제도의 개선방안
법학연구
2005 .11
-
中国死刑发展方向 - 以中日死刑比较为视角 -
원광법학
2016 .01
-
사형제도에 대한 국제협약과 국내 현황에 대한 연구
비교형사법연구
2012 .01
-
大韓民國에서의 死刑制度
비교형사법연구
2004 .01
-
동북아시아 사형제도의 현실에 대한 비판적 성찰
비교형사법연구
2010 .01
-
사형제도의 합리적 축소정비방안
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2005 .12
-
사형제도 폐지 논의에 대한 고찰
홍익법학
2007 .01
-
사형제도에 관한 연구
형사정책연구
2001 .09
-
사형제도 폐지에 관한 소고 : 헌법재판소 2010.2.25. 2008헌가23결정에 대한 비판적 검토
서강법률논총
2013 .02
-
사형제도의 어제와 오늘, 그리고 미래 전망
입법과 정책
2015 .01
-
로크의 사형론과 형사정책적 함의
법과 정책연구
2010 .01
-
미국의 사형제도 개괄
비교형사법연구
2010 .01
-
死刑制度의 存廢와 그 現實的 代案 : 絶對的 終身刑制 도입을 촉구하며
법학연구
2007 .02
-
전환기의 한국 형법-사형제도의 새로운 시각-
외법논집
2007 .01
-
사형제도에 대한 신학적 쟁점
법학연구
2008 .08
-
사형제도의 세계적 추세와 위헌성
동아법학
2009 .11
-
동아시아의 사형제도 현실과 미래 : 일본, 중국 그리고 한국을 중심으로
저스티스
2017 .02
-
미국의 중가산세 제도에 관한 고찰 : Fraud Penalty 관련 판례를 중심으로
한양법학
2014 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000475109