지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In 1995, revised the Criminal Law made new clause of fraud about computer use. The more society develop, more increase computer use and also the crime of new form -It used the computeroccurred. In order to regulate this crime, amend the Criminal Law.
It comes under Article 347-2 of the Criminal Code, use to computer something dishonest (inclusion of data processing or input not order) is punishment that for profit of property.
Because the text is enact in the abstract, the application of the text is not smooth about problem in connection with ATM(automated teller machine) that problem is a reason this text. And it will be apply to problem frequently.
A man draw out cash from an ATM by another person's card. In this case, not a few theory and precedent come to the conclusion that larceny. And, other advocate have been persisted that embezzlement.
The latest precedent decide that comes fraud about computer use about draw out cash from an ATM by another person's card in excess of one´s authority. But carry on a discussion about this. Unlike the Supreme Court, the lower court is opposed the application of fraud about computer use or continue a discussion on the application of larceny. the application of a this text come to the conclusion that take a triangular position firmly.
This text from Germany based on its. Germany’s text is punishing person that do damage to another person that affect result of data processing that includes the following ways: Making up a program inaccurately for acquisition of illegal profit, the unauthorized use of information, operation unwarranted process of data processing etc. compare Korean provision with German it, Germany come to the conclusion that reduced unprepared to the limit by referring to illegal data processing widely and correctly. Our provision must make up for the weak points or has to express provision in the concrete.
And, precedent and theory criticized repeatedly, it is necessary to consider profit of property provided in the text. because The text provide only profit of property, the cash is one of the property, the cash not apply of this text. Naturally, take advantage of rational a broad interpretation, we included cash among profit of property like some theory. But we must have a hard think about supplementing the text basically.
It comes under Article 347-2 of the Criminal Code, use to computer something dishonest (inclusion of data processing or input not order) is punishment that for profit of property.
Because the text is enact in the abstract, the application of the text is not smooth about problem in connection with ATM(automated teller machine) that problem is a reason this text. And it will be apply to problem frequently.
A man draw out cash from an ATM by another person's card. In this case, not a few theory and precedent come to the conclusion that larceny. And, other advocate have been persisted that embezzlement.
The latest precedent decide that comes fraud about computer use about draw out cash from an ATM by another person's card in excess of one´s authority. But carry on a discussion about this. Unlike the Supreme Court, the lower court is opposed the application of fraud about computer use or continue a discussion on the application of larceny. the application of a this text come to the conclusion that take a triangular position firmly.
This text from Germany based on its. Germany’s text is punishing person that do damage to another person that affect result of data processing that includes the following ways: Making up a program inaccurately for acquisition of illegal profit, the unauthorized use of information, operation unwarranted process of data processing etc. compare Korean provision with German it, Germany come to the conclusion that reduced unprepared to the limit by referring to illegal data processing widely and correctly. Our provision must make up for the weak points or has to express provision in the concrete.
And, precedent and theory criticized repeatedly, it is necessary to consider profit of property provided in the text. because The text provide only profit of property, the cash is one of the property, the cash not apply of this text. Naturally, take advantage of rational a broad interpretation, we included cash among profit of property like some theory. But we must have a hard think about supplementing the text basically.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 판례분석
Ⅲ. 학설의 대립과 관련범죄의 성립여부
Ⅳ. 컴퓨터등 사용사기죄에 관한 검토
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
현금지급기 부정사용에 관한 판례이론의 비판적 고찰
형사정책연구
2006 .12
-
현금흐름이 현금보유수준 변화에 미치는 영향 : 현금성자산증가와 투자부진의 원인 규명을 중심으로
산업경제연구
2007 .04
-
기업의 초과현금 보유가 현금의 한계가치에 미치는 영향
경영학연구
2012 .12
-
기업 현금성 자산 보유가 기업가치에 미치는 영향
한국경제연구
2007 .12
-
한국의 수출지향형 기업에서 현금유동성 결정정보에 관한 연구
통상정보연구
2009 .03
-
Cash Holding Levels and Partial Adjustments Toward Optimal: Evidence from three Asian Countries
경영교육연구
2013 .12
-
타인명의를 모용하여 발급받은 신용카드 사용행위의 형사책임
형사정책연구
2007 .09
-
절도죄의 객체에 관한 소고
법학연구
2008 .11
-
타인의 예금통장으로 예금을 무단인출하고 바로 반환한 사람의 형사책임
비교형사법연구
2011 .01
-
국내 상장기업의 현금흐름 변화가 현금보유에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
경영교육연구
2016 .12
-
기업의 초과현금 보유가 주주가치에 미치는 영향
산업경제연구
2012 .08
-
호텔 기업의 특성별 재무적 요인이 현금보유비율에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
호텔관광연구
2011 .03
-
정보적 과학 텍스트의 유형에 따른 초등학생들의 내용 이해도와 인식 비교
초등과학교육
2010 .01
-
금융전산화와 현금수요의 관계 재검토
한국경제연구
2004 .12
-
기업의 현금흐름이 현금보유에 미치는 비대칭적 영향
대한경영학회지
2013 .06
-
Corporate Excess Cash Holdings and Firm Value under Governance Consideration
金融工學硏究
2012 .01
-
현금흐름과 발생액 및 구성요소들이 현금흐름의 지속성과 기업가치에 미치는 영향
산학경영연구
2009 .01
-
현금흐름정보의 유용성에 관한 연구
국제회계연구
2011 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-000498671