메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김경숙 (강원대) 방경식 (강원대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제8권 제1호 (통권 제13호)
발행연도
2010.6
수록면
1 - 17 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of this article is to analyze the democracy, productivity and effectivity as a rationality standard of housing policy making. Furthermore, we will find out suggestions it need for governance on housing policy formation stage. The analytical approach based on a survey method was made in this article for rationality of hosing policy formation. Questionnaire was gathered from government officials, professors, researchers and NGO etc. About 197 people were selected through face-to-face interviews, e-mails and posts from Oct 22, 2009 to Nov 10, 2009. The data collected from the survey were analysed through the AMOS 17.0 regression analysis and SPSS statistical analysis.
Democracy, productivity and effectivity of ‘Participatory Government’s housing policy making were evaluated low aspects of rationality. It was analyzed on account of the following reasons: ⅰ) governance of housing policy development stage and policy making stage(formation stage) were lacking, ⅱ) a bundle of regulations (control of house selling price, control of housing reconstruction, rental houses supply and site supply) were not appropriate, ⅲ) it was evaluated that the housing policy and other national policy were not balanced, housing policy alternatives were not adapted in market, consistency of policy implementation and reliability of policy implementation were also lacking.
In conclusion, a bundle of housing policy alternatives suggested by ‘Participatory Government’ were not appropriate for evaluating rationality of policy making. That’s why governance of housing policy development stage and policy making stage were not sufficient, for it was lacking in citizen’s participation. Therefore, there needs to be improvement of the citizen’s participation in both policy development stage and policy making stage.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론 고찰
Ⅲ. 설문조사 설계
Ⅳ. 정책형성의 합리성 분석
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (42)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-595-001393714