지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Child abuse are body and life-threatening acts, and the most evident and serious abuse of parental rights. Parental rights need to be restricted in order to protect children from cases where parental rights are evidently against children’s interests, as well as to realize their welfare. Legal sanctions can be lawfully applied to such parents only when their parental rights are terminated through legal claims. This study presented counterplans for the termination of parental rights as in the following, on the authority of cases where private law and welfare are closely connected to each other in USA.
First, Child Welfare Act in force should be revised in order that the directors of child protection agencies can exercise the claim. What are more important, however, human and physical infrastructures should be expanded an also specialty should be secured so that child protection agencies can be on a par with DHS in dealing with the cases of child abuses.
Second, on in the existing law, the claim is based on comprehensive and abstractive standards. Hereupon, it is desirable to regard child abuse as a separate condition for terminating parental rights. In addition, as shown in USA, requirements for the termination of parental rights should be concretized on the basis of cases where children’s welfare is violated. With regard to the claim for the termination of parental rights, the court needs stay the execution for about six months in order that the causal problems of child abuse may be improved by the instrumentality of child protection agencies.
Third, it is advisable to present bringing-up plans in relation to the termination of parental rights, in order to cope with cases where parental rights are actually terminated.
Lastly, as shown in USA that systematically copes with child abuse, this study suggests that child abuse is not a family problem, but is a social problem and so the public cognition needs to be changed and the government needs to intervene in such problems actively as well as continuously.
First, Child Welfare Act in force should be revised in order that the directors of child protection agencies can exercise the claim. What are more important, however, human and physical infrastructures should be expanded an also specialty should be secured so that child protection agencies can be on a par with DHS in dealing with the cases of child abuses.
Second, on in the existing law, the claim is based on comprehensive and abstractive standards. Hereupon, it is desirable to regard child abuse as a separate condition for terminating parental rights. In addition, as shown in USA, requirements for the termination of parental rights should be concretized on the basis of cases where children’s welfare is violated. With regard to the claim for the termination of parental rights, the court needs stay the execution for about six months in order that the causal problems of child abuse may be improved by the instrumentality of child protection agencies.
Third, it is advisable to present bringing-up plans in relation to the termination of parental rights, in order to cope with cases where parental rights are actually terminated.
Lastly, as shown in USA that systematically copes with child abuse, this study suggests that child abuse is not a family problem, but is a social problem and so the public cognition needs to be changed and the government needs to intervene in such problems actively as well as continuously.
#아동학대
#친권상실
#복지적 지원
#가족의 재통합
#가족보존
#자녀의 복리
#자녀의 최선의 이익
#아동학대방지및대응에관한법률(CAPTA)
#국가의 개입
#입양원조및아동복지법(AACWA)
#입양및안전가족법(ASFA)
#소년법원
#심리절차
#입양
#가정위탁
#Child Abuse
#Termination of Parental Right
#Family Reunification
#Family Preservation
#Child Welfare
#The Best Interest of the Child
#CAPTA
#Intervention of State
#AACWA
#ASFA
#Juvenile Court
#Trial Procedure
#Adoption
#Foster Care
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 아동학대에 대한 대응과 연방법의 영향
Ⅲ. 친권상실의 요건과 효과
Ⅳ. 친권상실을 위한 법원의 심리절차
Ⅴ. 맺음말 - 국내법에의 시사점
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
[논문] 피학대아동에 대한 법적 보호 : 민법상 친권제한제도를 중심으로
법학연구
2015 .12
-
친권정지·제한제도에 관한 민법일부개정법률안의 소개 및 검토
국민대학교 법학연구소 학술발표대회 논문집
2014 .09
-
부모의 자녀관과 양육태도가 자녀학대에 미치는 영향
아동학회지
1996 .12
-
아동학대에 대한 친권제한의 실효적 적용에 관한 고찰 : 일본의 아동학대 방지 관련 법제와의 비교를 중심으로
법학연구
2016 .05
-
일본에서의 아동학대에 대한 대응체제와 법제도
법과 정책연구
2010 .01
-
개정 「아동복지법」과 아동학대
한양법학
2012 .02
-
학대피해아동에 대한 단기간의 분리보호 및 친권제한조치- 아동학대특례법의 내용을 중심으로 -
홍익법학
2015 .01
-
아동복지법상 아동학대에 관한 법적과제
원광법학
2008 .01
-
아동학대방지와 피해아동보호를 위한 친권법의 개정
중앙법학
2018 .09
-
미국의 친자법에 관한 연구
강원법학
2004 .06
-
현행 아동복지법에 관한 고찰 : 특히 아동학대와 관련하여
한양법학
2010 .08
-
아동과 부모, 가족환경 특성에 따른 아동학대 실태 연구
아동학회지
2003 .04
-
아동학대보호체계의 변화와 개선방안
한국가족복지학
2015 .01
-
아동권리와 가족지원
한국아동복지학
1998 .12
-
피해아동의 분리 보호와 친권의 제한
가족법연구
2019 .01
-
아동학대의 의의와 실태 및 대처방안에 관한 고찰
한양법학
2009 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-360-001271656