메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
강원대학교 비교법학연구소 강원법학 江原法學 제18권
발행연도
2004.6
수록면
33 - 69 (37page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Parental authority over children derives from the traditional principle of parental autonomy, where parents are the primary decision-makers for their children, without interference from the state or from third parties. This principle of parental authority is also protected as a fundamental right under the United States Constitution, and since 1965 has been described as part of the right of privacy developed in Griswold v. Connecticut.
The state limits parental authority where the child is being harmed by the parent's decision or where there are other compelling public polices. Because of the importance of the concept of parental autonomy in American society, the limitations, when they are imposed, tend to be minimal intrusions. The procedures for the termination of this right must, therefore, meet constitutional standards. The Supreme Court has held the following concerning procedural standards. An indigent parent does not automatically require the appointment of counsel to represent him or her in a termination proceeding, but a court must determine on a case-by-case basis whether this particular indigent parent needs counsel. If such counsel is needed, the state appoints and pays for the counsel. The standard for termination of parental rights is that of the best interests of the child. The standard of proof, however, that the state must meet in proving that it is in the best interests of the child to terminate parental rights is by clear and convincing evidence.
Also adoption is a court procedure by which an adult becomes the legal parent of someone who is not his or her biological child. Adoption creates a parent-child relationship recognized for all purposes-including child support obligations, inheritance rights and custody. While in most cases adults adopt miners, it is possible in most states for one adult to adopt another.
Regardless of type, adoptions can be granted only by a court and are allowed only when the court declares the adoption to be in the best interests of child. To assist the court in making this determination, the state (or local) welfare department conducts on investigation into the home maintained by the prospective adopting parents. The court looks at: the occupations, earnings and stability of the prospective parents; the medical, emotional and physical needs of the child; religious and racial compatibility; whether the prospective parents has any criminal record or history of child abuse; the age of the child.
Especially I have studied concerning the Best Interests of the Child in the American Parental authority and Adoption Law. As a result, For generations, American law has professed "the best interests of the child" doctrine, a "threshold standard," as the basis for american court decision and legislative intent concerning children.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 친권(Parental Authority)
Ⅲ. 입양(Adoption)
Ⅳ. 맺음말

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-018399715