지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 연구보고서
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.12
- 수록면
- 1 - 152 (152page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
As the needs for health, wellbeing, quality of life increase due to the increase of spare time, the improvement in income level, the change of value, the concern and participation rate for the physical activities of the citizens in Seoul constantly have increased. The increasing demand for physical activities requires the expansion of space of facilities for participation. The supply and use of sport facilities depends on consideration of fairness for accessibility to sport services and differentiation in strategy for physical facilities based on the characteristics of community. In order to establish supply policies of sport facilities, research on distribution conditions of the current sport facilities and spatial inequality and supply and demand of community is need. Through analyzing the behavior of participation in physical activities and the needs of the citizens of Seoul and differences in the current supply situations of the sport facilities, the present condition of physical facilities can be found, and based on this, efficient supply system and action plan for the sport facilities in Seoul can be suggested. Therefore, in this study, as a response to changed sport environments and a preliminary step of sport policies for qualitative and quantitative consideration on sport services, the current conditions for the supply of sport facilities are analyzed and efficient supply system and action plan for the sport facilities are suggested.
In this study, the sport facilities are categorized into public sport facilities, quasi sport facilities such as community centers or youth centers, and private sport facilities. Public sport facilities of Seoul are placed and managed by Sport Promotion Division, Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, and Green Seoul Bureau. Quasi sport facilities are placed and managed by several divisions such as Health & Welfare Bureau of Seoul, Woman & Family Policy Affairs, Administration Bureau, and Cultural Affair Bureau. However, each organization has different tasks and budget support and is managed by different administrative organizations, so it is difficult to supply and manage sport facilities. In addition, because sport facilities are supplied by several organizations, sport facilities are not provided to regions in need and are unequally supplied according to the financial condition of regions, which shows a large gap. To examine the sport facilities closely, compared with 4,214 of public sport facilities, quasi sport facilities in Seoul including local sport facilities, private sport facilities are 10,492 which are more than two times. Yet, public sport facilities and private sport facilities show competitive relations rather than complementary.
The results of research on sport facility usage of the citizens of Seoul in 2008 show that the response rate for sport facility in use located near their homes is low, and the most frequently used facilities are mainly outdoor facilities such as parks, the riverside of Han River, school grounds, and hiking trails, which their accessibility is within 10 minutes. As the reasons for not participating in sport activities are busy and lazy which are the most frequently responded answers, the main reason of non participation in sport activities is the will of participants rather than the lack of space or facilities. However, the response about needs to participate in sport activities is space expansion and openness which show the highest response rate, so it is important to expand and open sport facilities for the citizens with the will to participate in sport activities.
In order to solve the problem of supply and demand for sport facilities in Seoul, Seoul needs to establish supply policies of sport facilities to provide it efficiently. First, as control policies for supply which is made by each organization, the classification of program, space size, and the number of facilities need to be found, and sport facilities should be provided appropriately by strengthening competence for existing facilities and considering geographical characteristics. Second, based on the characteristics of each facility in the community, installation criteria, building criteria, and efficient management criteria need to be prepared within the range to lead the maximum participation in sports for local residents. Third, a key sport facility needs to be appointed in order to prevent from repetitive supply of programs and facilities and to provide effective sports related services for efficient management in the community. Fourth, due to the site limitation for the sport facilities, Seoul needs to improve accessibility of sport facilities to promote participation in sports by making alliances with private sport facilities. To introduce the plan, the selection criteria for private enterprises and the institutional reviews need to be made thoroughly.
In this study, the sport facilities are categorized into public sport facilities, quasi sport facilities such as community centers or youth centers, and private sport facilities. Public sport facilities of Seoul are placed and managed by Sport Promotion Division, Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, and Green Seoul Bureau. Quasi sport facilities are placed and managed by several divisions such as Health & Welfare Bureau of Seoul, Woman & Family Policy Affairs, Administration Bureau, and Cultural Affair Bureau. However, each organization has different tasks and budget support and is managed by different administrative organizations, so it is difficult to supply and manage sport facilities. In addition, because sport facilities are supplied by several organizations, sport facilities are not provided to regions in need and are unequally supplied according to the financial condition of regions, which shows a large gap. To examine the sport facilities closely, compared with 4,214 of public sport facilities, quasi sport facilities in Seoul including local sport facilities, private sport facilities are 10,492 which are more than two times. Yet, public sport facilities and private sport facilities show competitive relations rather than complementary.
The results of research on sport facility usage of the citizens of Seoul in 2008 show that the response rate for sport facility in use located near their homes is low, and the most frequently used facilities are mainly outdoor facilities such as parks, the riverside of Han River, school grounds, and hiking trails, which their accessibility is within 10 minutes. As the reasons for not participating in sport activities are busy and lazy which are the most frequently responded answers, the main reason of non participation in sport activities is the will of participants rather than the lack of space or facilities. However, the response about needs to participate in sport activities is space expansion and openness which show the highest response rate, so it is important to expand and open sport facilities for the citizens with the will to participate in sport activities.
In order to solve the problem of supply and demand for sport facilities in Seoul, Seoul needs to establish supply policies of sport facilities to provide it efficiently. First, as control policies for supply which is made by each organization, the classification of program, space size, and the number of facilities need to be found, and sport facilities should be provided appropriately by strengthening competence for existing facilities and considering geographical characteristics. Second, based on the characteristics of each facility in the community, installation criteria, building criteria, and efficient management criteria need to be prepared within the range to lead the maximum participation in sports for local residents. Third, a key sport facility needs to be appointed in order to prevent from repetitive supply of programs and facilities and to provide effective sports related services for efficient management in the community. Fourth, due to the site limitation for the sport facilities, Seoul needs to improve accessibility of sport facilities to promote participation in sports by making alliances with private sport facilities. To introduce the plan, the selection criteria for private enterprises and the institutional reviews need to be made thoroughly.
목차
[표지]
[요약 및 정책건의]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[제1장 연구개요]
제1절 연구의 배경과 목적
제2절 연구내용 및 연구방법
[제2장 체육시설의 공급]
제1절 공급정책
제2절 공급 및 설치기준
제3절 공급현황
제4절 체육시설 공급현황 분석과 문제점 도출
[제3장 서울시민의 체육시설 이용실태]
제1절 설문개요
제2절 설문분석
제3절 요약 및 시사점
[제4장 해외도시의 체육시설 공급정책 사례]
제1절 캐나다 브리티시컬럼비아주 밴쿠버시
제2절 미국 뉴욕주 뉴욕시
제3절 시사점
[제5장 서울시 체육시설 공급 및 활용방안]
제1절 공급모형
제2절 서울시 체육시설 공급 및 활용방안
[제6장 체육시설의 공급사례]
제1절 공급사례 선정
제2절 강남구
제3절 마포구
제4절 동대문구
제5절 금천구
제6절 중구
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[영문요약(Abstract)]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지역 스포츠콘텐츠를 통한 스포츠산업 활성화 : 안동시 사례
문화산업연구
2010 .08
-
스포츠 선호와 참가여부가 스포츠 가치에 미치는 상호작용 효과
한국체육교육학회지
2009 .12
-
Sport marketing and media research: contributions from the global network of scholars in sport management
Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구)
2013 .01
-
스포츠 시설의 이용실태 분석 연구 : 충남지방을 중심으로
한국체육교육학회지
2002 .03
-
지방자치단체 공공체육시설의 운영성과 분석과 향후 개선방안
도시행정학보
2000 .12
-
An Extraction and Analysis of the Candidated Promising Sports Industries for National Sports Technology Policy
경영과학
2014 .12
-
한ㆍ미ㆍ일 스포츠 산업의 현황과 전망
한국무역학회 국제학술대회
2003 .10
-
Culture and behavior in sport
서울행정학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2013 .07
-
A societal perspective of sport: scale development in two settings
Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구)
2012 .01
-
지방화시대에 부응하는 스포츠의 기능
지역개발연구
2002 .12
-
스포츠 상해 유형에 따른 형사책임 면제범위
중앙법학
2015 .09
-
中国体育法的法理机制研究 -基于美国和日本的体育法分析-
동북아법연구
2020 .01
-
서울시의 활동여가시설의 입지유형에 관한 연구 : 강남구를 중심으로
지역연구
1994 .12
-
스포츠미디어의 유통 콘텐츠 결정요인으로서 스포츠 스타: 의제설정 이론의 암묵적 전제를 중심으로
유통과학연구
2019 .01
-
대학 시설경영관리 능률향상을 위한 FM 항목분석
한국퍼실리티매니지먼트학회지
2018 .01
-
법령상의 스포츠산업정책에 관한 연구
한국자치행정학보
2011 .01
-
공공 및 사회 체육 시설을 이용한 특기 적성 체육활동 활성화 방안
한국체육교육학회지
1999 .08
-
교정보호시설의 입지갈등과 대응방안 연구
형사정책연구원 연구총서
2018 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-359-001025740