메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
허혜정 (한국사이버대학교)
저널정보
한국동서비교문학학회 동서비교문학저널 동서비교문학저널 제20호
발행연도
2009.6
수록면
287 - 309 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
??The aesthetic sense between African(Negro) literature and Korean modern literature holds a sheer difficulty to be understood, if only excluding the history of ‘slavery’ and its extremely troubling process of independence and autocratical inheritance seen as political corruptions. The concern toward Africa and its literature, from the imperial periods during which the cruel oppression and plundering were mercilessly underway, which was unparalleled to the world history brought the people of Chosun dynasty into becoming acute in their political awareness. In the political games and the logic of capital confiscations of powerful nations, African modern literature was translated and then introduced into Korean people as the post-colonial symbol of retrieving the sovereignty of liberty, independence, and expression. If ‘the voice of Africa’ had been made called as resistance and independence in the times of colonialism, ‘the voice’ was accommodated in the structure of ‘the 3rd world’ having the critical recognition against the western modernity after the era of Koreans’ struggling for independence and the Korean civil war.
??The Africa literature gave salience to the importance of the entity of tradition and culture, “a nation as a self-will” not as a nation merely existing to the men of letters suffered from the coercion of long-period colonial rulings, pro-American anti-communism, and powerful nationalism. Their own literature that built the literary identity and style with the humanistic robust sensitive faculty, away from the way of European literature, was accepted as an intensive experimental style by the young avant-garde who had taken lead of the aesthetic modernism since 1950s. In addition, what the camp of popular literature in 1970s paid attention to, as well, was undoubtedly the popular nature of African literature, the restoration of folk convention, folklore, and realistic mode. African literature lifted up a new energy from those of human, Mother Nature, native countries, and mother tongues, from the discourse of independence and freedom. And this is the reason why the literature of Africa should be looked back anew in the relationship with Korean modern literature.

목차

1. 서론
2. ‘보종보국론’과 아프리카에 대한 인식의 탄생
3. 문학후발국론과 흑인문학에 대한 인식
4. 국가주의 대 휴머니즘
5. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-000791172