지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The term ‘mode’ is redefined. The world consists of cases(following Wittgenstein"s “Die Welt is alles was der Fall ist”). Each case(as a whole) looks this way or other (ontological mode), and the knower captures the case as it looks (epistemic mode) and the speaker expresses it as a predicate of the case (linguistic mode). In this way we can avoid the vagueness of the so-called definition of the mode ‘the speaker"s attitude toward a proposition’.
When we investigate the modal phenomena we need to look into the acts involved in uttering a sentence. There are linguistic acts like stating, informing, demanding, threatening and so on. And there are epistemic acts like seeing, hearing and knowing. Furthermore we need to understand about action, acts in general. For example, we need to understand that every act has its belief and desire involved.
In Korean, the sentence final clitics like ‘-ta, -ne, -ni’ are the markers which indicate the acts of a speaker. They indicate a stating, an informing, and an affirming of a fact respectively. They do not have the modal meaning like ‘speaker knowing, hearer unknowing’ themselves. These modal meanings are presupposed or implied by the acts or by the desires and beliefs involved in the acts. The Korean sentence final clitic ‘-gess’ has no meaning ‘intention or desire’, and . ‘-ci’ is not a sentence final expression at all.
To get a proper view on the modal phenomena we need a proper theory of meaning, the theory of action, the epistemology, and we need a unificational view on the various manifestations of the mode, about the situations of the linguistic acts and the interactions between the speaker and hearer and so on.
When we investigate the modal phenomena we need to look into the acts involved in uttering a sentence. There are linguistic acts like stating, informing, demanding, threatening and so on. And there are epistemic acts like seeing, hearing and knowing. Furthermore we need to understand about action, acts in general. For example, we need to understand that every act has its belief and desire involved.
In Korean, the sentence final clitics like ‘-ta, -ne, -ni’ are the markers which indicate the acts of a speaker. They indicate a stating, an informing, and an affirming of a fact respectively. They do not have the modal meaning like ‘speaker knowing, hearer unknowing’ themselves. These modal meanings are presupposed or implied by the acts or by the desires and beliefs involved in the acts. The Korean sentence final clitic ‘-gess’ has no meaning ‘intention or desire’, and . ‘-ci’ is not a sentence final expression at all.
To get a proper view on the modal phenomena we need a proper theory of meaning, the theory of action, the epistemology, and we need a unificational view on the various manifestations of the mode, about the situations of the linguistic acts and the interactions between the speaker and hearer and so on.
목차
1. 들어가기
2. 정의
3. 행위
4. 언어 행위와 인식 행위
5. 시제와 양상
6. 접속사와 양상
7. 고유 양상과 파생 양상
8. 맺음
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 박재연 / 2006 / 한국어 양태 어미 연구 / 태학사
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 1996 / ‘이다’의 범주 / 언어학 18
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 2007 / -나, -도, -만 / 언어학 47 (47) : 139 ~ 157
5. [단행본] - Austin,J.L / 1962 / How to Do Things with Words / Clarendon Press
6. [단행본] - Bybee, J / 1995 / Modality in Grammar and Discourse / John Benjamins Publishing Company
2. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 1996 / ‘이다’의 범주 / 언어학 18
3. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 이향천 / 2007 / -나, -도, -만 / 언어학 47 (47) : 139 ~ 157
5. [단행본] - Austin,J.L / 1962 / How to Do Things with Words / Clarendon Press
6. [단행본] - Bybee, J / 1995 / Modality in Grammar and Discourse / John Benjamins Publishing Company
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
영한 번역의 종결어미 사용 연구
통번역교육연구
2019 .01
-
Morphosyntactic Correlates for Simple Sentence Production in English and Korean
언어
2012 .03
-
Linguistic Studies on Language Modes
응용언어학
1997 .12
-
영어 중첩 서법조동사의 통사적 구조
열린정신 인문학연구
2007 .06
-
영어와 한국어의 법성표현 대조연구
언어과학연구
1993 .12
-
The Semantics of Epistemic Modality
영어학연구
2009 .01
-
러시아어 인상술어에 대한 통사적 고찰: 양상조동사(modals)를 중심으로
외국학연구
2012 .01
-
인식적 양상 문장의 의미론에 있어서의관점투영적 파라미터 도입의 필요성과온건한 관점투영 상대주의에 대한 옹호
철학연구
2015 .09
-
양상조동사에 대한 담화적 고찰
새한영어영문학
2005 .11
-
Someone’s Speech and Speaker’s Thought : The Sentence-Final Particle ‘-ko’ in Korean
언어
2002 .06
-
中国の日本語連体修飾節構文研究 : 研究方法と理論を中心に
일본연구
2012 .08
-
아랍어의 양상표현 방식에 관한 고찰 - 인식 양상을 중심으로 -
아랍어와 아랍문학
2010 .01
-
정중함을 위한 화행의 완화장치(mitigating devices)
슬라브학보
2008 .12
-
러시아어 양상술어의 발달에 작용한 문법화의 기제
슬라브학보
2008 .09
-
'What is said' and speaker's meaning
담화·인지언어학회 학술대회 발표논문집
2006 .12
-
한국어 종결어미 '-네'와 단언화행
언어
2014 .09
-
한국어 교육을 위한 드라마의 간접화행 분석
어문론집
2012 .03
-
청자의도(H-intentions)의 개념화와 방향성 연구 : 가족 담화를 중심으로
어학연구
2015 .12
-
세계 영어의 지역적 차이에 대한 말뭉치 분석연구
새한영어영문학
2007 .05
-
한국인 학습자 코퍼스와 원어민 코퍼스에 나타나는 if-조건문의 사용양상 비교
영어학연구
2020 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002732649