지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This research aims to introduce and examine the (atomic) notion of translation as an indispensable prerequisite for the ontology of the sign itself?as well as the organismic and systematic aspects of the semiosis-sensitive translation typology?proposed by Susan Petrilli who has much contributed for the development of meta translation theory over the last several decades. Specifically speaking, it seeks to stress and evaluate the value of the Petrillian perspective on translation viewing the Peircean notion of translativity as the key milestone for a new, Biosemiosphere-sensitive paradigm of the (meta) translative/ translational mechanism, which is conducive to the evolutionary (revision and) development of the conventional, narrow notion of (interlingual) translation and to the transhumanities-sensitive transdisciplinary communication. Employing and reviving the translative mechanism of the interpretant (underlying the Peircean triadic model of the sign ontology) and the global dimension of the Biosemiosphere (meaningfully interconnected with the Anthroposemiosphere thanks to Sebeok) in a transdisciplinarily organismic and cooperative way, Petrilli proposes that, by having another sign brought across boundaries and function as the interpretant of the sign itself, the sign’s constitutive modality slash mechanism is (or, at least, entails) translation as such (Petrilli 2003; Petrilli 2012; Petrilli 2014) (cf. TRANSLATION, Lim, E. 2013; Lim, D. 2014a) and that it is highly feasible to systematically classify and specify the translation typology within the Biosemiosphere and, also, across the Anthroposemiosphere, especially, by investigating the translative nature (and the structural mechanism) of the sign itself. While paying due attention to Petrilli’s (meta) translative notion applied to the realms of the (semiotic/ translational) meaning-making processes, the main body of the research introduces and describes what Petrilli considers as the major translation types on the basis of the new notion of translation as such. Subsequently, it shows that translation typology can be subclassified into intersemiosic/ endosemiosic/ anthroposemiosic/ intersemiotic/ interlinguistic/ endolinguistic/ endoverbal/ endolingual translation types (and, additionally, from endoverbal translation into interlingual/ endolingual translation types and from endolingual translation into diamesic/ diaphasic/ diglossic translation types) (Petrilli 2012: 234, quoted in Lim, E. 2013: 64). With such a microscopic and macroscopic approach to (the possible precursor of) meta translation theory, this research discovers and confirms that, despite the possible room for further discussion and task specification in practice, Petrilli’s notion and typology of translation can work as the (meta) epistemological framework and analysis tool to (re-) investigate and (re-) analyze the fundamental principles and scopes of various translation phenomena in the global semiosphere(s). In addition, by means of (meta-/ inter-/ trans-) semiotic scrutinization, it becomes evident that the Petrillian translation paradigm can offer us various opportunities to develop the life-oriented transdisciplinary insight into meaning, semiosis, translation, language, and the world(s) (beyond the dichotomy of human/ language/ culture versus animal/ instinct/ nature), which can act as a potential yet critical catalyst for the evolutionary emergence/ establishment of the new transhumanities.
In conclusion, this research proposes that Petrilli’s (meta) translation theory can play positive roles as a constructive (meta) epistemological and translative/ translational paradigm, with which all those “translators” in many disciplines can collaborate effectively and “translate” multidimensionally, especially, via critical (meta-/ trans-) semiotic investigation and open transdisciplinary communication toward the development of our transhumanities.
In conclusion, this research proposes that Petrilli’s (meta) translation theory can play positive roles as a constructive (meta) epistemological and translative/ translational paradigm, with which all those “translators” in many disciplines can collaborate effectively and “translate” multidimensionally, especially, via critical (meta-/ trans-) semiotic investigation and open transdisciplinary communication toward the development of our transhumanities.
목차
1. 서론
2. 선행연구 : 번역의 개념
3. 페트릴리의 기호 기반 번역
4. 기호기반 번역과 인문학
5. 결론
참고문헌
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Metatranslative Signs of Dumas and Hamong : Names as Texts and Metaphors Therein
번역학연구
2018 .12
-
중국 고대 역장(驛場)제도에 대한 고찰- 번역의 시스템과 방법을 중심으로-
언어학연구
2017 .01
-
번역사(飜譯史)와 번역사 연구의 개념
T&I REVIEW
2016 .06
-
번역학 연구에서 다중 번역 텍스트의 활용을 위한 방안
통번역학연구
2017 .01
-
AI시대 학부번역수업의 기계번역 적용에 관한 연구 - 중한번역수업 심층인터뷰를 중심으로
번역학연구
2025 .03
-
한영 법령 번역 품질 제고를 위한 번역 방식에 관한 소고 ?직역 문제를 중심으로?
통역과 번역
2022 .04
-
한국어 교재의 중국어 번역 방법 연구
이중언어학
2015 .01
-
Applying Pym’s Typology Of Translation Solutions To Korean-English Text Analysis: A Preliminary Study To Use The Typology In An Undergraduate Translation Class
T&I REVIEW
2022 .12
-
학부 스페인어 번역수업의 실무 지향적 접근 - 기능주의 번역이론을 바탕으로
스페인어문학
2016 .12
-
다자(多者) 수행 번역의 문제점 및 번역 교육 현황에 관한 고찰- 일관성의 관점에서
통역과 번역
2015 .01
-
번역공학적 이성 비판: 디지털 시대 번역학의 과제
번역학연구
2020 .10
-
미국, 유럽, 중국, 캐나다, ISO 번역 표준에 관한 복수사례연구
번역학연구
2015 .06
-
번역과정에 있어서의 번역브리프와 번역결정- 다국어사전 구축 번역에 대한 사례연구
통역과 번역
2016 .01
-
기계번역·인간번역·트랜스크리에이션의 문체 비교: 광고 번역을 중심으로
통번역학연구
2017 .01
-
학부 한영번역 수업에서는 기계번역을 통해 어떤 도움을 받을 수 있을까?
영어권문화연구
2023 .04
-
일한기계번역의 오류유형에 관한 고찰-일본소설을 중심으로-
일어일문학연구
2018 .01
-
인공지능 번역 시스템의 출현에 대한 소고
번역학연구
2017 .12
-
Crowdsourced translation and machine translation and their implications in the digital age : A case study of Flitto
번역학연구
2017 .10
-
재(再)-번역은 무엇인가
민족문화
2017 .12
-
역(逆)번역을 활용한 문학번역 교육 - 신경숙의 『엄마를 부탁해』의 한국어↔스페인어 번역을 중심으로
스페인어문학
2019 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-800-001637962