메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최수경 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국중어중문학회 중어중문학 中語中文學 第62輯
발행연도
2015.12
수록면
27 - 63 (37page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
55 minorities in modern China are classified either as ‘non(非)-Chinese’ though they used to live in China or as descendants of ‘四夷’(si yi, non-Chinese of the four quarters) who used to live in neighboring areas. Those groups had various forms of relationship with Chinese government and have been recognized and recorded by Chinese. This study is mainly aimed to analyze the discourse about ‘四夷’ of Ming Dynasty intellects, particularly, about ‘蠻夷’(man yi) who used to live in South-western area of China. Main objects of study are 筆記(biji, informal jottings) works which described South-eastern area in 16thcentury. 王濟(Wang Ji)’s 『君子堂日詢手鏡』(Jun zi tang ri xun shou jing) completed in 1522 intensively described differences and boundaries between non(非)–Han people of South-western are and Han people of 中原(central plains). Since then, 田汝成(Tian Rucheng)’s 『炎徼紀聞』(Yanjiaojiwen) published in 1560 tried to assort and classify ‘蠻夷’ in South-western area. Tian Rucheng recognized and assorted the ethnicity of ‘蠻夷’ through various criteria of lineage, appearance, and cultural customs. In addition, descriptions of both Wang ji and Tian Rucheng showed characteristics of natural history. Wang ji plainly made them materialized and connected their nature with animals by juxtaposing non-Han people with ‘things(物)’ in the area. On the other hand, Tian Rucheng compared and classified them. He dominated them as objects of knowledge and information and incorporated them into a knowledge system by naming and defining them. This is the final goal of natural history, too. One common point from both Wang Ji and Tian Rucheng was that their discourses about ‘蠻夷’ didn’t include willingness to cultivate and civilize them. Traditionally, Chinese government has emphasized on ideology of ‘great unity’(大一統) that multi-ethnic groups should be unified into Han-centered culture, coexisting together. However, unlike these official discussions, ‘蠻夷’ was an object of separation, not of unification inside of Ming Dynasty intellects’ conceptions.

목차

1. 서론
2. 갈등의 邊境 : 明 정부와 西南 지역 非漢族人의 관계
3. 蠻夷 敍事의 패턴과 그 의미
4. 결론
【參考文獻】
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2016-820-002335563