메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국현대소설학회 현대소설연구 현대소설연구 제13호
발행연도
2000.12
수록면
173 - 192 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Focusing on the relationship between time structure and consciousness, this study is designed to examine Hwang Sun-won's short novel, <Tomorrow>. Hwang develops this story according to the chronological time which flows from the present to the future. We can find that he uses both reminiscent narrative and prospective narrative at the same time in the story, and all of the anecdotes are closely related to the main story. Although the story develops in a lineal way, from the past to the present and to the future, we can find so-called artificial time order narrative is also used in the story. While the story develops in the natural time order, Hwang dramatizes the past by revealing the consciousness of the character in reminiscences. The consciousness is characterized by the fact that it has its objects, among which things in the past are certain. Therefore, it is necessary to note that Hwang often claims reminis-cences or dreams when he dramatizes overlapping of consciousnesses. To roughly explain the relationship between time and ideology is based on the fact that views of the time depend on views of the world. There are some examples that explain this with borrowed conceptions from Greek Myths. Despite not being exactly corresponded to the following conception, when the past is emphasized, we can name it Apollonian time. In this case, the time reasonably completed is the matter. Time absorbed into the present is symbolized by Dionysus. The view of the time that foresees the future is Promethean view. When a story is told with focusing its view on the future, it becomes prophetic. However, a novel is less prophetic than any other literary genres; therefore, in a novel, it is not desirable to emphasize the future excessively because to do so might damage the unique characteristic of the genre of novel. With these arguments, we can interpret the future dramatized in Tomorrow in a more abstruse way. The problem is what romanticism is in a novel. Romanticism is premised on the duality of the world. Romanticism is characterized by pursuing an ideal in seeing the reality as something to overcome. But this characteristic of romanticism opposes the idea that novel should participate in the present. With this, to pursue romanticism in seeking aesthetically perfect state by giving up the romanticism might be a paradoxical methodology of novel. Each of the characteristic of romanticism and of novel persists through the restraint of not adapting the future vision to the real world. In this point, Tomorrow is s work that persists aesthetics by aesthetic restraint.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-810-000973698