메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
동국대학교 불교학술원 International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture Vol.24
발행연도
2015.2
수록면
95 - 124 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article examines the comparison of the Pāyāsi sutta in the Pāli Dīgha Nikāya (DN) with its parallel sutra from the Chinese Dīrgha Āgama (DA) by applying the principles of textual criticism. The comparison of the Nikāya and the Āgama allows us to identify significant similarities between them and evaluate these differences so as to support the conjecture of some people concerning the content of early Buddhist canonical texts. The differences are examined by a method based on two assumptions and four approaches to Buddhist textual criticism. The first assumption is that if all text versions were alike, reciters of the oral tradition from different sects would probably remember them from the same message or source, possibly the original message or a copy from the sect before the sect split off from its predecessor. The second assumption is that if other sutras or other kinds of evidence are in agreement with a given version, then the text of that version might be likely to be valid and logical or is probably reasonable. Firstly, the obvious differences will be examined in context through their own logical processes (internal consistency). Secondly, they will be evaluated against evidence from other Buddhist texts that have a corresponding sutra in, respectively, Chinese and Sanskrit texts (internal parallel evidence); followed by other texts, respectively, in Pāli and Chinese (internal horizontal evidence). Thirdly, they will be evaluated against relevant Pāli commentaries and sub-commentaries (internal vertical evidence). Finally, there will be an investigation based on external evidence or comparisons with non-Buddhist texts and both historical and anthropological evidence (external evidence). This paper also determines the factors that make the differences difficult to examine. This comparison study aims to show that the existing DA texts and all of the Āgama help us to confirm the early Buddhist message.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (61)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2017-022-001962237