메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최성근 (영남대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제29권 제2집(통권 제62집)
발행연도
2018.5
수록면
55 - 92 (38page)
DOI
10.35227/HYLR.2018.05.29.2.55

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Digital economy stands for an economy based on information and communication technology. Some characteristics regarding the digital economy are that there exists no form of the assets being transacted, it is based on R&D which requires vast amount of cost, and international trade based on it is being conducted in a fast and diverse manner. Under this digital economy, multinational enterprises are avoiding tax more easily and are introducing new forms of tax avoidance. Tax agencies of each country are facing the limitation that they cannot effectively deal with these problems with the conventional tax avoidance regulation system. OECD has name this tax avoidance problem in the digital economy as BEPS (Base Erosion and Profit Shifting) and the member states have searched for common countermeasures. Their efforts had won the day and OECD submitted the final report comprehending 15 Actions of the BEPS project to the G20 summit in November 2015 and received sanction.
Timing holds great significance in legislation. It also applies when the persona interested have immense influence both socially and economically. If this chance is lost, no one will know when a chance to effectively reestablish regulation regarding the tax avoidance of multinational enterprises will come. If Korea solely tries to modify the taxation system after realizing the seriousness of the tax avoidance problem in future, the contracting party of tax treaty may not abide to it and multinational enterprises or the countries that the parent companies of multinational enterprises located in may oppose greatly. Non-binding guidelines of international organizations like OECD do not hold direct binding power. However, it can provide grounds to interpretation of the domestic law and also provide a just cause for legislation of domestic law. To effectively regulate multinational enterprises’ tax avoidance, there is a need to properly modify tax treaty and domestic tax law under the support of this OECD BEPS project.

목차

Ⅰ. 다국적기업의 조세회피행위와 OECD BEPS 프로젝트
Ⅱ. 종래의 다국적기업 조세회피행위의 유형과 한국에서의 규제체계
Ⅲ. 최근의 다국적기업 조세회피행위의 경향과 사례
Ⅳ. OECD BEPS 프로젝트의 다국적기업 조세회피행위에 대한 권고사항의 이슈별 검토
Ⅴ. 다국적기업 조세회피행위 규제의 체계화를 위한 입법방향
【참고문헌】
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-360-002233363