메뉴 건너뛰기
Library Notice
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Log in Register Help KOR
Subject

Study on the differentiation of legal treatments of artificial intelligence generated works - Focused on the introduction of 'formalities'
Recommendations
Search
Questions

인공지능 창작물에 대한 법적취급 차별화 방안 검토 : '방식주의'의 도입을 중심으로

논문 기본 정보

Type
Academic journal
Author
Hyun-Kyung Kim (서울과학기술대학교)
Journal
Chungnam National University Law Research Institute Chungnam Law Review Vol.29 No.2 KCI Accredited Journals
Published
2018.5
Pages
119 - 162 (44page)
DOI
10.33982/clr.2018.05.29.2.119

Usage

cover
📌
Topic
📖
Background
🔬
Method
🏆
Result
Study on the differentiation of legal treatments of artificial intelligence generated works - Focused on the introduction of 'formalities'
Ask AI
Recommendations
Search
Questions

Abstract· Keywords

Report Errors
Artificial intelligence produces works on a level that is almost the same as human-created works. However, in the case of artificial intelligence generated works, the personality of the author does not appear in the light of the essence of the copyright system. Also, since ’creative labor’ comes from author’s personality, it is not reasonable to apply the copyright system for artificial intelligence generated works without the protection on personality of artificial intelligence itself. ‘Willingness and intention as an author’, which is the basis of creative incentives, is also not compatible with artificial intelligence. Therefore, artificial intelligence generated works should not be treated the same way as Creatures by humans, but differentiated. There is no need to protect artificial intelligence generated works in terms of whether they should be “protected” in light of the intent of the copyright system. However, it is recognized that it is necessary to protect the investment to create and develop artificial intelligence generated works. Therefore, if a certain protection is given to artificial intelligent generated works, the subject who enjoys the protection can be a person who invested heavily in the production of the artificial intelligence generated works. For them, the weakened protection such as monetary claim is more appropriate than the exclusive rights such as copyrights. On the other hand, if a person who has control over an artificial intelligence generated works claims to be his or her own creation, it would be very difficult to reveal the truth unless there is a system to identify the artificial intelligent generated works. Therefore, in order to differentiate the legal treatment of artificial intelligence generated works, identification system is needed so that users can distinguish artificial intelligence generated works from human creatives. For artificial intelligence generated works, automatic and compulsory identification systems are introduced to distinguish human artworks from them.

Contents

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 인공지능 창작의 특성
Ⅲ. 차별적 취급의 당위성
Ⅳ. 차별적 취급의 전제로서 방식주의 도입 검토
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
국문초록
Abstract

References (0)

Add References

Recommendations

It is an article recommended by DBpia according to the article similarity. Check out the related articles!

Related Authors

Frequently Viewed Together

Recently viewed articles

Comments(0)

0

Write first comments.