지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제43호
- 발행연도
- 2018.10
- 수록면
- 40 - 57 (18page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2018.10.43.40
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The goal of this study is to suggest an alternative term for the Korean biblical term “Maeg Chu Jeol” (Exo 23:16a) (which means the feast of barley harvest) which is also referred to as “Chil Chil Jeol” (the feast of weeks) and “Oh Sun Jeol” (Pentecost). Many Korean churches have confused “Maeg Chu Jeol” with the Korean traditional thanksgiving feast of barley harvest which most Korean churches observe in July each year.
The study explores three different approaches to analyzing the translation of “Maeg Chu Jeol”: 1) a linguistic approach in the translation of the word תנ הקציר 2) a socio-cultural approach to the feasts of the Old Testament for which the people of God offered seasonal agricultural products; and 3) a hermeneutical approach to the three major feasts.
The translation of “Maeg Chu Jeol” in Exodus 23:16a is an incorrect rendering considering the meaning of תנ הקציר which simply means the feast of harvest. Hence, תנ הקציר can be better translated to the feast/festival of harvest as represented in the majority of English Bible translations. פפורי קציר חמיםר (Exo 34:22a) has been mistakenly translated to the feast of the first fruits of barley harvest (NKR; KRV). The word קציר חמיםר. does not mean barley harvest but wheat harvest. It would therefore be more accurately translated to the first fruits of wheat harvest as translated in the majority of English Bible translations.
Considering the agricultural products that the people of God offered for the feasts, the type of grain that the Israelites offered for the feast of weeks was not barley but wheat. Thus, the term “Maeg Chu Jeol” itself (which means the feast of barley harvest) does not accurately represent the biblical feast.
When it comes to the hermeneutical meaning of feasts in the Old Testament, the feast of weeks was not linked to a thanksgiving feast of barley harvest, but to the celebration day of the coming of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost. Therefore this term brings about a more serious hermeneutical problem because of Korean churches’ confusion of “Maeg Chu Jeol” as the thanksgiving feast of barley harvest. If they observe the thanksgiving feast of barley harvest in this sense, they should also keep the Passover Festival and the Feast of Booths in a literal sense. Hence, “Maeg Chu Jeol” should be replaced by a new term.
Once the feast of barley harvest is replaced by a new term the feast of harvest, it may significantly reduce the Korean churches’ confusion of the thanksgiving feast of barley harvest as the feast of weeks.
The study explores three different approaches to analyzing the translation of “Maeg Chu Jeol”: 1) a linguistic approach in the translation of the word תנ הקציר 2) a socio-cultural approach to the feasts of the Old Testament for which the people of God offered seasonal agricultural products; and 3) a hermeneutical approach to the three major feasts.
The translation of “Maeg Chu Jeol” in Exodus 23:16a is an incorrect rendering considering the meaning of תנ הקציר which simply means the feast of harvest. Hence, תנ הקציר can be better translated to the feast/festival of harvest as represented in the majority of English Bible translations. פפורי קציר חמיםר (Exo 34:22a) has been mistakenly translated to the feast of the first fruits of barley harvest (NKR; KRV). The word קציר חמיםר. does not mean barley harvest but wheat harvest. It would therefore be more accurately translated to the first fruits of wheat harvest as translated in the majority of English Bible translations.
Considering the agricultural products that the people of God offered for the feasts, the type of grain that the Israelites offered for the feast of weeks was not barley but wheat. Thus, the term “Maeg Chu Jeol” itself (which means the feast of barley harvest) does not accurately represent the biblical feast.
When it comes to the hermeneutical meaning of feasts in the Old Testament, the feast of weeks was not linked to a thanksgiving feast of barley harvest, but to the celebration day of the coming of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost. Therefore this term brings about a more serious hermeneutical problem because of Korean churches’ confusion of “Maeg Chu Jeol” as the thanksgiving feast of barley harvest. If they observe the thanksgiving feast of barley harvest in this sense, they should also keep the Passover Festival and the Feast of Booths in a literal sense. Hence, “Maeg Chu Jeol” should be replaced by a new term.
Once the feast of barley harvest is replaced by a new term the feast of harvest, it may significantly reduce the Korean churches’ confusion of the thanksgiving feast of barley harvest as the feast of weeks.
목차
1.들어가는 말
2.‘맥’(麥)이라는 용어의 의미장(semantic field)
3.맥추(절)이란 용어의 언어학적 분석
4.절기별로 드린 농산물 유형의 관점에서 본 ‘맥추절’ 용어 평가
5.구약 3대 절기의 해석학적 의미에서 본 칠칠절의 의의
6.맥추절 대신 사용해야 할 용어
7.나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
술과 축제, 그리고 의례 - 의례 및 축제고고학의 구체적 실천을 위한 시론 -
한국신석기연구
2022 .12
-
The Transformation of Game Practices with Ritual Wine Drinking within Traditional Culture : Feast by the Meandering Stream in China, Korea and Japan
역사와 세계
2017 .12
-
임금의 잔치와 거리의 잔치 ― 마태복음 22:1-14; 누가복음 14:15-24
신학사상
2021 .01
-
조선 초기 궁중연향별 성격과 악대 사용에 관한 연구 ? 성종대 정립 양상을 중심으로 ?
온지논총
2021 .01
-
시편 126편 초막절 배경에서 읽기
구약논단
2019 .03
-
20세기 중후반 농촌과 어촌의 회갑잔치 존재양상 비교 : 경북 영양군 감천1리와 영덕군 병곡2리를 중심으로
비교민속학
2017 .12
-
러시아 카바레와 미니어처 극장의 기원과 탄생 (1) : 기원과 문화적 전사(前史)의 문제
러시아어문학연구논집
2021 .08
-
‘성찬 없는’ 크리스마스와 케냐의 절대적 빈곤의 풍경—우웸 아크판의 ｢크리스마스 성찬｣
영어영문학21
2023 .03
-
『용궁부연록(龍宮赴宴錄)』에 나타난 인물의 태도와 윤필연(潤筆宴)의 의미
어문학
2019 .03
-
『겐지 모노가타리(源氏物語)』에 나타난 음주로 발현되는 행동유형
일본문화학보
2019 .08
-
조선시대 회방回榜의 변천과 시행
국학연구
2016 .08
-
『바베트의 만찬』: 이방인 요리사의 식탁과 일상의 혁명
외국문학연구
2020 .02
-
무대로 다시 호명된 여자들의 향연-백현미, 『근대 극장의 여자들』, 서울: 연극과인간, 2016.
어문론총
2017 .03
-
임병철, 「불안 속에서 피어난 지성의 향연: 르네상스를 빛낸 이탈리아의 지식인들」 (여문책, 2023)
서양사론
2024 .03
-
장서각 소장 사찬발기를 통한 조선왕실의 사찬음식 연구 - 탄일, 출산, 가례, 상례를 중심으로 -
한국식생활문화학회지
2019 .01
-
큰 잔치 비유(눅 14:15-24)의 사회과학적 해석 : ‘가십 네트워크’와 ‘명예게임’, ‘호혜작용’을 통해 큰 잔치 비유 읽기
신학논단
2023 .09
-
Central Eurasian Cultural Elements in the Old English Epic Beowulf As Seen from the Representation of Feasts
알타이학보
2024 .06
-
코리언의 혼례 전통 계승과 현대적 변용
통일인문학
2015 .09
-
고려시대 詠花詩 고찰의 일면 - 문인들의 집단 창작을 중심으로-
동방한문학
2022 .09
-
The Moving Feast: Reading into the Fragrant Chapter of the Vimalakīrtinirdeśa
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2021 .12
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
욥기 30:22하반절 ‘크티브’/‘크레’의 선택과 문학적-수사학적 번역
안근조
성경원문연구
2017
.04
시편 1-3편의 본문 분석을 통해 살펴본 불가타 번역의 특징
박철우
성경원문연구
2009
.04
“그녀가 운다” - 생태비평으로 읽는 예레미야 12장 -
유연희
성경원문연구
2021
.10
Word Order in Biblical Hebrew Poetry : A Reassessment of the Concept of Focus
David J. Fulle
성경원문연구
2019
.04
요한계시록의 바다의 등장(4:6)과 전개(15:2)와 퇴장(21:1) 과정에 나타난 신학적 의의와 새 출애굽
김선욱
성경원문연구
2019
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0