지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제43호
- 발행연도
- 2018.10
- 수록면
- 58 - 74 (17page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2018.10.43.58
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In many cultures, old traditions and memories are often transmitted in the form of hymns and songs. It is the same in the Old Testament. The oldest records in the Old Testament are mainly songs, which are usually referred to as ancient Hebrew poetry. These include the Blessing of Jacob (Gen 49), the Song of Moses (Exo 15), the Prophecies of Balaam (Num 23-24), the Blessing of Moses (Deu 33), the Song of Deborah (Jdg 5), the Song of Habakkuk (Hab 3), 2 Samuel 22 (= Psa 18), and Psalms 68.
Translating these ancient Hebrew songs is a difficult and challenging task. There are several reasons for this. First of all, since these songs are very old, it is not easy to restore or reconstruct the contents of the original text where the text is seriously damaged. There are also cases where the classical Hebrew grammar and spelling, which we are familiar with, do not apply to these poems. These early forms of Hebrew should be understood through comparison with other Semitic languages such as Akkadian, Ugaritic, and Hebrew inscriptions.
Ancient Hebrew poetry has linguistic features that are not found in the classical biblical Hebrew. For example, (1) t-prefixed form is used instead of y-prefixed form for an imperfect third person plural; (2) the frequent use of the so-called nun energicum in all imperfect forms; (3) תי is used for a perfect second person feminine singular; (4) the use of enclitic ט (mem); and (4) the disappearance of the nota accusativi –ta.
Apart from the difficulty of translation, there is another important reason to study ancient Hebrew poetry. Since these poems are from the earliest period of Israel, they preserve the information about the early traditions of the origin and development of the religion of Israel and the faith of Yahwism.
This study attempts to translate introductory part of the so-called “Blessing of Moses” (Deu 33:2-3). The result of this study reconstructs verses 2 and 3 as three stanzas of three lines each (2a, 2b, 2c/2d, 2e, 3a/3b, 3c, 3d).
The most divergent part of my translation is that it sees the “holy ones” in 3b as heavenly beings whereas other previous Korean versions translate it as “the faithful.”
This study further requires the translation of the main body of the Blessing of Moses as well as of other ancient Hebrew songs.
Translating these ancient Hebrew songs is a difficult and challenging task. There are several reasons for this. First of all, since these songs are very old, it is not easy to restore or reconstruct the contents of the original text where the text is seriously damaged. There are also cases where the classical Hebrew grammar and spelling, which we are familiar with, do not apply to these poems. These early forms of Hebrew should be understood through comparison with other Semitic languages such as Akkadian, Ugaritic, and Hebrew inscriptions.
Ancient Hebrew poetry has linguistic features that are not found in the classical biblical Hebrew. For example, (1) t-prefixed form is used instead of y-prefixed form for an imperfect third person plural; (2) the frequent use of the so-called nun energicum in all imperfect forms; (3) תי is used for a perfect second person feminine singular; (4) the use of enclitic ט (mem); and (4) the disappearance of the nota accusativi –ta.
Apart from the difficulty of translation, there is another important reason to study ancient Hebrew poetry. Since these poems are from the earliest period of Israel, they preserve the information about the early traditions of the origin and development of the religion of Israel and the faith of Yahwism.
This study attempts to translate introductory part of the so-called “Blessing of Moses” (Deu 33:2-3). The result of this study reconstructs verses 2 and 3 as three stanzas of three lines each (2a, 2b, 2c/2d, 2e, 3a/3b, 3c, 3d).
The most divergent part of my translation is that it sees the “holy ones” in 3b as heavenly beings whereas other previous Korean versions translate it as “the faithful.”
This study further requires the translation of the main body of the Blessing of Moses as well as of other ancient Hebrew songs.
목차
1.시작하는 말
2.모세의 축복 개관
3.본문 비평 및 번역
4.본문 재구성, 번역, 단락 구분
5.맺는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
드보라의 노래에 나타나는 난해절들의 번역과 그 역사적 배경
구약논단
2021 .09
-
성서 히브리어 발음 교육을 위한 제언 — 자음 명칭을 중심으로 —
성경원문연구
2023 .04
-
Biblical Hebrew and Modern Hebrew : How Much Do They Understand?
성경원문연구
2016 .04
-
히브리서에 나타난 거룩한 대화 연구
신학지남
2021 .12
-
구약성서시대 문화 이해를 통한 우리말 번역에 대한 제언
구약논단
2018 .09
-
The Story of Greater Exodus in Hebrews: A Narrative Reading of Hebrews 3-4
ACTS 신학저널
2021 .10
-
구조로 보는 히브리서의 언약
신학지남
2018 .09
-
히브리서 4장 12-13절에 사용된 ‘로고스’(lo,goj)의 해석에 대한 재고
신약연구
2022 .12
-
히브리서 4:12-13의 ὁ λόγος와 “전쟁-안식-제의” 모티프
신약연구
2024 .06
-
히브리 시의 평행법과 한글번역 : 한계와 여지(餘地)
구약논단
2018 .09
-
성서 히브리어의 언어 변이
구약논단
2022 .03
-
히브리서의 구조
개신논집
2020 .09
-
집회서 48:17-22의 히스기야 터널에 관한 고찰 - 히브리어 본문과 칠십인역의 본문 비교 -
성경원문연구
2020 .04
-
A Computational Approach to Syntactic Diversity in the Hebrew Bible
성경원문연구
2019 .04
-
히브리적 사고와 기독교교육: 히브리적 사고에 기초한 성경 스토리텔링
신학과세계
2019 .09
-
북이스라엘 히브리어 연구에 대한 비판들과 응답
구약논단
2022 .09
-
Word Order in Biblical Hebrew Poetry : A Reassessment of the Concept of Focus
성경원문연구
2019 .04
-
성서와 히브리 유산 : 구약과 신약의 연속성
구약논단
2018 .12
-
기독교 교부들의 히브리서 저자에 관한 논쟁
신학과 사회
2017 .08
-
히브리어 ‘rbd’의 활용과 상호적 의미 연구
신학논단
2016 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
성서히브리어 명사문장의 어순에 관한 연구
권성달
성경원문연구
2014
.10
“너희가 미쳤구나”인가 “너희에게 신이 임했구나”인가? : 고린도전서 14:20-25의 μαίνεσθε의 번역 재고
권영주
성경원문연구
2019
.04
잠언 31:1-9 번역과 해석에 대한 연구 : ‘맛사’와 ‘데렉크’에 대한 연구를 중심으로
배재욱
성경원문연구
2019
.04
전도서의 일상과 노동의 관점 : 전도서 2:18-26을 중심으로
김순영
성경원문연구
2018
.04
출애굽기 1:1-15:21에 나타난 ‘이름’의 문학적 및 신학적 의미
유윤종
성경원문연구
2017
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0