지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제43호
- 발행연도
- 2018.10
- 수록면
- 161 - 183 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2018.10.43.161
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Hebrew/Aramaic text used as the basic text in the academia of the Old Testament all over the world today is the Leningrad Codex. The most significant reason why the Leningrad Codex, transcribed in the most recent period, is used as the basic text in the worldwide academia of the Old Testament is because it has the entire main text of the Old Testament. However, biblicists at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem showed interest in the Aleppo Codex among the Masoretic manuscripts and began a systematic research by collecting the copies of Aleppo Codex that were scattered around the world through various routes for decades. Many Jewish scholars comparatively studied the Aleppo Codex and other manuscripts, and concluded that the Aleppo Codex best preserves the traditions of the Masoretic manuscripts and is the most accurate. Jewish scholars consider the Aleppo Codex as the most accurate and reliable manuscript, while regarding the Leningrad Codex as a manuscript that includes relatively more errors than the Aleppo Codex. Thus, specific and objective comparative study and analysis are needed on the Leningrad Codex and the Aleppo Codex. If the Leningrad Codex is selected as the basic text just because it includes the entire Old Testament despite its many errors, it is necessary to seriously consider whether it is desirable to use the Leningrad Codex as the basic text in not only Korea but also the world’s academia of the Bible study. Moreover, research and analysis are needed in terms of the level of accuracy and reliability of the Aleppo Codex, which is rated highly by the biblicists at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and whether it is highly overrated in some ways.
Mordechai Breuer listed the differences among various Masoretic manuscripts in the historical and prophetic books. This study selected only the Leningrad Codex and Aleppo Codex among the various manuscripts listed by Breuer and conducted a complete enumeration survey on 311 cases that showed a difference, after which it analyzed accuracy through statistical analysis. As a result, this study reached the following conclusion.
(1) There are two cases in which the Leningrad Codex is highly accurate: one is in the spelling of the name of God as a noun despite other word spelling differences, and the other is in the spelling of numbers as a noun despite other word spelling differences.
(2) There are 18 cases in which the Aleppo Codex is highly accurate: ten in Ktiv/Qre, eight in other word spelling differences (one pronoun, two verbs, two prepositions, two number differences, and one other consonant difference).
(3) There is one case in which both have problems: In 2 Samuel 18:8, there is a verb difference among other word spelling differences.
(4) There are 290 cases in which it is difficult to evaluate reliability: 267 in mood, three in the order of characters, 20 in other word spelling differences (five prepositions, four nouns, two number differences, nine consonant differences).
According to the results of this study, the Aleppo Codex generally showed higher accuracy compared to the Leningrad Codex, and thus the evaluation of Jewish scholars stating the excellence of the Aleppo Codex is positive. The negative evaluation of the Leningrad Codex by Jewish scholars tends to be immoderate, though.
Mordechai Breuer listed the differences among various Masoretic manuscripts in the historical and prophetic books. This study selected only the Leningrad Codex and Aleppo Codex among the various manuscripts listed by Breuer and conducted a complete enumeration survey on 311 cases that showed a difference, after which it analyzed accuracy through statistical analysis. As a result, this study reached the following conclusion.
(1) There are two cases in which the Leningrad Codex is highly accurate: one is in the spelling of the name of God as a noun despite other word spelling differences, and the other is in the spelling of numbers as a noun despite other word spelling differences.
(2) There are 18 cases in which the Aleppo Codex is highly accurate: ten in Ktiv/Qre, eight in other word spelling differences (one pronoun, two verbs, two prepositions, two number differences, and one other consonant difference).
(3) There is one case in which both have problems: In 2 Samuel 18:8, there is a verb difference among other word spelling differences.
(4) There are 290 cases in which it is difficult to evaluate reliability: 267 in mood, three in the order of characters, 20 in other word spelling differences (five prepositions, four nouns, two number differences, nine consonant differences).
According to the results of this study, the Aleppo Codex generally showed higher accuracy compared to the Leningrad Codex, and thus the evaluation of Jewish scholars stating the excellence of the Aleppo Codex is positive. The negative evaluation of the Leningrad Codex by Jewish scholars tends to be immoderate, though.
목차
1.들어가는 말
2.연구 방법
3.레닌그라드 사본과 알레포 사본의 비교 및 평가
4.나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
바리새파 서기관들은 과연 예수를 추종했었는가? - 시내산 사본의 마가복음 2:15-16 본문 연구
신약연구
2017 .01
-
Verses in the ‘Wrong’ Chapter : When Chapter Division and Structural Segmentation in the Old Testament Do Not Match
성경원문연구
2015 .10
-
The Hebrew Proto-Masoretic Text of Habakkuk 3:1-4 and Its Interpretive Presentations in Other Biblical Texts
성경원문연구
2016 .10
-
Qu'est-ce qu'un livre? - Métaphores du passé, incertitudes du présent -
인문과학
2016 .01
-
사도행전에서 D(05)의 신학적 경향
신학논단
2017 .03
-
Alexis Peri. The War Within: Diaries from the Siege of Leningrad.
REGION
2018 .01
-
존 로스 번역본 『예수셩교 요안복음젼셔』 초판(1882)의 ‘간음한 여인 이야기’ (요7:53 - 8:11) 삭제 문제
한국교회사학회지
2016 .05
-
새로 확인된 『현관장엄론』 게송사본과 아리야 비묵띠세나의 『현관장엄론』 주석서 콜로폰
불교학연구
2015 .01
-
어문 규범으로 보는 음운 현상의 표기 반영 양상 ― ｢普通學校用 諺文綴字法｣과 ｢한글 마춤법 통일안｣을 중심으로 ―
어문연구(語文硏究)
2019 .01
-
인도어 사본 연구 현황과 과제: 국내학계를 중심으로
불교학연구
2019 .01
-
A Text Critical Analysis of the First Taunt Song in Habakkuk 2:5-8
Canon&Culture
2018 .10
-
한국 성인 학습자의 영어 철자오류 분석
현대영어영문학
2015 .01
-
레닌그라드 봉쇄 시기 올가 베르골츠의 작품속에 나타난 여성 형상 연구
외국문학연구
2025 .02
-
성경 사본 보기
성서마당
2017 .09
-
‘상징적 오브제(Symbolic Object)’와 기억 : 레닌그라드 봉쇄(Блокада Ленинграда, 1941.9.8.~1944.1.27.)를 중심으로
역사연구
2016 .12
-
구약 성경의 본문과 문서의 역사 연구 : 바르텔레미의 Studies in the Text of Old Testament를 중심으로
성경원문연구
2015 .10
-
표기 오류와 발음의 상관성 고찰 ― 한국어 L2 학습자를 대상으로 ―
우리말연구
2018 .01
-
영어 SMS의 발음철자법에 대한 음운론적 분석
언어학
2016 .01
-
영어 철자 오류의 원인 탐색: 학생 면담을 통해
Foreign Languages Education
2024 .02
-
초기(기원후 2-3세기) 교회의 성경 책 이해-코덱스(Codex) 선호의 배경과 의미-
신약연구
2018 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
구약 성경의 본문과 문서의 역사 연구 : 바르텔레미의 Studies in the Text of Old Testament를 중심으로
이은우
성경원문연구
2015
.10
욥기 42:1-7: 이유 없는 고난
김상기
성경원문연구
2010
.04
히브리어/헬라어 사전에 관하여 [Η/G-LEXICONS]
서정욱
한국언어학회 학술대회지
2004
.07
주요 요약구절인 사도행전 9:31의 번역
정창욱
성경원문연구
2019
.04
잠언 31:1-9 번역과 해석에 대한 연구 : ‘맛사’와 ‘데렉크’에 대한 연구를 중심으로
배재욱
성경원문연구
2019
.04
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0