메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국감성과학회 감성과학 감성과학 제19권 제2호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
89 - 100 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Inclusive design is increasingly gaining attention, as some people find using products difficult after becomingphysically impaired, despite daily use. However, making inclusive products is a challenge for designers or companies,as a lack of knowledge and tools stems their low involvement in it. Developing inclusive design tools is thusneeded. This study developed criteria to assess upper extremity capabilities corresponding to specific daily activities. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 58 physiatrists and orthopedists. Non-parametric statistics wereemployed and medians were adopted as representative scores in the assessment criteria based on normality andreliability test results, non-normal data, and strong reliability of respondents in ranking. Consequently, an assessmenttool was developed with 14 criteria (divided into range of motion and strength) and capability scores between 0 and100, which discerned the moderately impaired from the severely disabled and fully capable. Since the doctorsagreed to adopt the criteria but assign numeric values, especially for mild impairments, their capability assessmentperception was likely influenced by dichotomy. To compensate for these deficits, qualitative or ergonomic approachesare considered simultaneously.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0