메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국고전르네상스영문학회 고전 르네상스 영문학 고전 르네상스 영문학 제25권 제1호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
33 - 55 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay explores the correlation between Lear’s Fool and Yeats (both his Fool and himself as a dramatist). The Fool in King Lear is an artificial fool who wears a motley coats and a cockscomb for his job. But compared with other typical artificial fools, he might look like a natural fool who loses his wits because of his unusual attitude: he devotes himself to Cordelia sincerely and suffers from Lear’s tragedy together. In spite of this fact, however, he is eventually estimated as a supremely wise fool who follows some value different from a secular one. Yeats’s Fool, on the other hand, is an Irish village fool as shown in his The Hour-Glass. He is a natural fool who has lost his wits, but he is also a holy fool who retains supernatural wisdom. Hence, though he is apt to be treated as a fool in the visible world, he can be evaluated as a wise man if our life is expanded to the invisible world. This evaluation is true of Mary the heroine of the play The Land of Heart’s Desire, who may be useless in her reality as a result of her aspiring to Fairyland. In conclusion, this essay argues that Yeats as a dramatist can be differently estimated according to the point of view. He desired the symbolic theater instead of following the realistic theater, popular among his contemporaries because he believed it was more valuable to stir the audience' imagination than to be popular. Thus, he may be considered as an unpopular dramatist, whereas he can also be judged as a great artist who has “the untamed and untamable mind of the world.”

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0