메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
원광대학교 법학연구소 원광법학 원광법학 제25권 제4호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
229 - 248 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, I'll discuss about the relation between Administrative Penalty and Administrative Order Punishment under the premise that a new consideration about Administrative Order Punishment, which is one of the accepted sanctions as means of achievement of Administrative Effectiveness, is needed. Administrative Order Punishment has been increased because of the side effects like mass-producing more ex-convicts that had been produced by levying Administrative Penalty on the trivial Administrative Law violators. A large amount of fine for default that is prescribed as Administrative Order Punishment in the particular laws has a character as a penalty. Regulatory Offense Law is produced to consolidate the execution process that had been spread in particular laws. As I consider the necessary subjective conditions and the statute of limitations, which are demanded when Administrative Order Punishment is levied by Regulatory Offense Law, I think Administrative Order punishment must not be levied on a trivial administrative law violator as before and must not be considered as an easier sanction than Administrative Penalty.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (21)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0