메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙대학교 법학연구원 法學論文集 法學論文集 제40권 제2호
발행연도
2016.1
수록면
429 - 454 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (5)

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Trying to control the social problems often requires law reform. The reason of such a request is the expectation that legislative purposes will reflect on judicial decisions and result actual judgements. However, will law reform including raising statutory punishment always lead changes of punishment? This paper studied on the case of law reform of <Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes> in 2011 and change in courts’ sentencing. This law reform has contributed the legislative purpose as strengthening punishment in part. After the law reform, judgements have increased, provisions have diversified and judges’ sentencing length has risen. But this law reform has clear limitations. This case shows some results away from legislative purposes on three aspects. First, the law reform has some effects from unexpected directions. Second, it causes some results at opposite poles. Third, it cannot achieve its intended objectives. It has clear limitations for law reform to lead the change of judicial decisions as implied by the case study. Law makes unexpected results in combination with a variety of factors and produces the opposite effect to what is intended sometimes. Besides, court is not a transparent path that reflects legislative changes like it is. If some perspectives that hinder the realization of legislative purposes prevail among judges, law reform will bring results away from its original purposes. In the face of social problems, if we intend legal changes, we should consider various ways like these.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0