메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
국제한국어교육학회 한국어 교육 한국어 교육 제16권 제2호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
197 - 216 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper discusses the discourse function of the accusative case by critically reviewing the previous syntactic and semantic analyses, and then presenting the reasons why the previous analyses cannot explain the phenomenon in which the accusative case appears in the adverbial phrase. In this paper it is argued that there are two types of the accusative case: one is the structural case which is assigned to the NP with the theta role of Patient/Theme and is generated in the complement position of a verb; the other is the discourse case which is assigned to the NP which is interpreted as a patient or a theme at discourse. Moreover this paper explores discourse constraints which the adverbial phrases have to satisfy for the interpretation of a patient/theme at discourse. Firstly, if the locative argument can be interpreted as a theme, there must be the implication in which the locative arguments have to be involved in a whole area by the described action. Otherwise the action implied by a location must be performed when locomotion takes place. If the possessive argument can be interpreted as a patient, there should be interaction between the agent and the possessor in the described event. If the material argument can be interpreted as a theme, the material should remain as an indispensable part of the resulted object in the described event. Finally, if the dative argument can be interpreted as a patient, it should present with the agent at the same time and the same place to the extent that the interaction between them is implied.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0