지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 대한성서공회 성경원문연구 성경원문연구 제45호
- 발행연도
- 2019.10
- 수록면
- 93 - 113 (21page)
- DOI
- 10.28977/jbtr.2019.10.45.93
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The present research attempts to illuminate the semantic and theological difference between λαός (Mat 1:21) and ἔθνος (Mat 21:43) in the Gospel of Matthew. Admittedly, it is sometimes argued that λαός indicates the Church in Matthew 1:21. However, it should be noted that after the first appearance of λαός in Matthew 1:21, its second occurrence is found in Matthew 2:4 which says “the chief priests and scribes of the λαός.” It is of no doubt that the groups, qualified by the genitive of λαός here, refer to the ruling elites of ‘Israel.’ This being so, it is hardly conceivable that the same term λαός which indicated the Church in Matthew 1:21 would changes its meaning so radically six verses later. Thus, λαός (Mat 1:21) can better be understood as referring to Israel.
The interpretation of ἔθνος (Mat 21:43) has been the subject of much debate among the Matthean scholars. Some, by limiting the responsibility for the repeated murder in the parable to Israel’s leadership alone, argue that ἔθνος in Matthew 21:43 signals the appearance of new leadership such as Jesus’ disciples. If understood against the wider background of the Gospel, however, the culprits of Jesus’ death are not limited to the elites of Israel(cf. Mat 27:25). In Matthew’s theological outlook, it is not only the leaders but also the people of Israel in general that contributed to the murder of God’s messengers and Jesus (cf. Mat 23:29-36). The term ἔθνος (Mat 21:43) then needs to be understood as indicating ‘the faithful Christians,’ be it Gentile or Jewish, to whom the status of God’s people is granted in place of the unfaithful Israel.
Given the difference between λαός (Mat 1:21) and ἔθνος (Mat 21:43), it is naturally expected that their translations into Korean might have been done with two different terms. Since the publicatin of Ross’s Version of the Korean NT in 1887, the translators have however used the same word 백셩 for both λαός (Mat 1:21) and ἔθνος (Mat 21:43). It seems that the Chosun collaborators of Ross, influenced by the use of 百姓in the mandarin Chinese Bible, employed 백셩 to translate the Chinese word 民in the Wen-li versions. Although this translation failed to distinguish the two important Greek terms in Matthew, it is still retained in the New Korean Revised Version (NKRV). It is therefore necessary to find suitable Korean parallels of λαός (Mat 1:21) and ἔθνος (Mat 21:43), for instance, 민족 for the former and 백성 for the latter.
The interpretation of ἔθνος (Mat 21:43) has been the subject of much debate among the Matthean scholars. Some, by limiting the responsibility for the repeated murder in the parable to Israel’s leadership alone, argue that ἔθνος in Matthew 21:43 signals the appearance of new leadership such as Jesus’ disciples. If understood against the wider background of the Gospel, however, the culprits of Jesus’ death are not limited to the elites of Israel(cf. Mat 27:25). In Matthew’s theological outlook, it is not only the leaders but also the people of Israel in general that contributed to the murder of God’s messengers and Jesus (cf. Mat 23:29-36). The term ἔθνος (Mat 21:43) then needs to be understood as indicating ‘the faithful Christians,’ be it Gentile or Jewish, to whom the status of God’s people is granted in place of the unfaithful Israel.
Given the difference between λαός (Mat 1:21) and ἔθνος (Mat 21:43), it is naturally expected that their translations into Korean might have been done with two different terms. Since the publicatin of Ross’s Version of the Korean NT in 1887, the translators have however used the same word 백셩 for both λαός (Mat 1:21) and ἔθνος (Mat 21:43). It seems that the Chosun collaborators of Ross, influenced by the use of 百姓in the mandarin Chinese Bible, employed 백셩 to translate the Chinese word 民in the Wen-li versions. Although this translation failed to distinguish the two important Greek terms in Matthew, it is still retained in the New Korean Revised Version (NKRV). It is therefore necessary to find suitable Korean parallels of λαός (Mat 1:21) and ἔθνος (Mat 21:43), for instance, 민족 for the former and 백성 for the latter.
목차
1. 들어가며
2. 마태복음 1:21의 λαός와 마태복음 21:43의 ἔθνος
3.『개역개정』에서 마태복음 1:21의 λαός와 마태복음 21:43의 ἔθνος가 ‘백성’으로 번역된 과정
4. 마태복음 1:21와 마태복음 21:43의 ‘백성’에 대한 잠정적 제안
5. 맺으며
참고문헌(References)
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『개역개정』에서 ἔθνος 의 번역 ― 바울서신을 중심으로 ―
성경원문연구
2022 .08
-
고린도전서 11:10의 ἐξουσίαν ἔχειν ἐπὶ τῆς κεφαλῆς 번역 문제
성경원문연구
2022 .08
-
‘두 아들의 비유’(마 21:28-32)의 본문 유형과 국문 번역사 고찰
성경원문연구
2022 .10
-
요한계시록의 ‘땅에 거하는 자들’과 가나안 정복 모티프
신약연구
2021 .09
-
Μονογενὴς Θεός – the Prophet-like-Moses Par Excellence and the Unique Exegete of the Father : An Exegetical and Text-Critical Study of John 1:17-18
성경원문연구
2018 .10
-
즈카르야의 노래(루카 1,68-79)에 관한 고찰과 ὁδούς(76절)에 대한 번역 제안
신학전망
2024 .09
-
마태복음 24:36-25:30 주해
개신논집
2016 .09
-
The Church as the New People of God in the Gospel of Matthew
신학논단
2017 .12
-
히브리서 4:2절과 11:39-40절에 나타난 새 언약 백성의 특권
신학지남
2020 .03
-
온유한 자는 복이 있나니- ‘호이 프라에이스’(οἱ πραεῖς)는 어떤 사람들인가?
신약연구
2017 .01
-
영어성경(NIV)의 한국어 번역에 대한 몇 가지 제안 - 마태복음을 중심으로 -
영어영문학
2019 .08
-
새 시대의 삶의 원리로써 성령: ὁ νόμος τοῦ πνεύματος τῆς ζωῆς(롬 8:2)에 대한 또 다른 이해
신약연구
2020 .01
-
부적절한 장애인 호칭들의 문제와 대안 - 공인 번역 성경들을 중심으로
장신논단
2020 .06
-
“애굽으로부터 내 아들을 불러냈다”(마태복음 2:15): 마태의 호세아 11:1 인용에 나타난 기독론적-모형론적 해석
갱신과 부흥
2019 .01
-
“내가 너를 좋아한다” : 성경본문 마태복음 1장 9-11절
세계와선교
2016 .12
-
코로나19와 누룩 - 마태복음 13장 33절
신학사상
2020 .01
-
성경 번역의 특징과 활용하기
성서마당
2015 .09
-
Comparative study on bone regeneration between silk mat incorporated 4-hexylresorcinol and collagen membrane
International Journal of Industrial Entomology
2017 .01
-
마태복음 27:53의 “예수의 부활 후에”에 대한 내본문적 연구
신약논단
2018 .03
-
하나님의 구원의 ‘적기’(καιρὸς)에서 ‘완수’(τέλος)까지 : 마가복음의 구원론적 해석(막 1:14-15; 13:1-7)
신학과 사회
2022 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0