메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영미문학페미니즘학회 영미문학페미니즘 영미문학페미니즘 제27권 제2호
발행연도
2019.1
수록면
91 - 120 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper, I argue that the characterization of Van Helsing and Dracula is built upon Ruskin’s dichotomization of Christianity as medieval proto-Protestantism (Protestant Catholicism) and Roman Catholicism. Ruskin’s dichotomy relies on the demonization of Roman Catholicism which is viewed as promoting homosexuality and female sexuality. Protestant Crusaders are initially suspicious of the use of Catholic symbols that Van Helsing introduces. However, it is not their science and technology but Catholic rituals of exorcism that can overpower Dracula. By demonstrating the magical power of Catholic symbols, Van Helsing leads them to accept Protestant Catholicism. However, in contrast to Dracula’s protestant spirit of rebellion against accepted norms, Van Helsing seems to be a repressive Roman Catholic Inquisitor who performs a sadistic ritual of staking Lucy to defend the norms of gender and sexuality. Thus it is difficult to contain Van Helsing and Dracula within Ruskin’s dichotomy. The fact that Jonathan Harker catalyzes the reintroduction of Roman Catholicism in Britain implies that Dracula is equivalent to the Oxford Movement. Since Catholicism is accepted by Protestants in Dracula, it becomes evident that the conventions of Gothic fiction that entail the demonization of Catholicism are not viable in the twentieth century

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (35)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0