지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동국대학교 불교학술원 International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture Vol.29 No.2
- 발행연도
- 2019.12
- 수록면
- 69 - 91 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.16893/IJBTC.2019.06.29.2.69
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Although the tradition of the East Asian Buddhist logic is a transmission of the system of Indian logic established by Dignāga (ca. 480–540), it developed in its own way in East Asia. East Asian Buddhist logic should be reconsidered in the context of the East Asian Buddhist tradition, instead of based on Western or Indian logic-centrism.
The twelfth section of P’an piryang non written by Wŏnhyo (617-686) metalogically discusses the logical problem of the antinomic reason (*viruddhāvyabhicārin), one of the fallacies of the reason of the three-part syllogism. Some textual problems remain in the section preserved in the manuscript of Otani University. Wŏnhyo seemed to have a keen interest in the antinomic reason. Although Dignāga categorizes the antinomic reason as one of the six fallacies of the inconclusive reasons, it has been questioned whether the categorization is valid by premodern Buddhist logicians and current scholars. Wŏnhyo tried to solve the problem through a kind of reductio ad absurdum method. Thus, he transformed the principle of the antinomic reason and showed the tautological redefinition, which probably is in conflict with the rule of the fallacy of both-agreement. According to these points, Wŏnhyo’s perspective of the antinomic reason seems to resemble the standpoint of Mun’gwe (fl. 7th century) more rather than that of Kuiji (632-682).
These points found in the short descriptions of P’an piryang non probably express the features of Wŏnhyo’s logic and not of his logical misinterpretation. We need an even more detailed examinations of P’an piryang non from the viewpoints of textual criticism and logic.
The twelfth section of P’an piryang non written by Wŏnhyo (617-686) metalogically discusses the logical problem of the antinomic reason (*viruddhāvyabhicārin), one of the fallacies of the reason of the three-part syllogism. Some textual problems remain in the section preserved in the manuscript of Otani University. Wŏnhyo seemed to have a keen interest in the antinomic reason. Although Dignāga categorizes the antinomic reason as one of the six fallacies of the inconclusive reasons, it has been questioned whether the categorization is valid by premodern Buddhist logicians and current scholars. Wŏnhyo tried to solve the problem through a kind of reductio ad absurdum method. Thus, he transformed the principle of the antinomic reason and showed the tautological redefinition, which probably is in conflict with the rule of the fallacy of both-agreement. According to these points, Wŏnhyo’s perspective of the antinomic reason seems to resemble the standpoint of Mun’gwe (fl. 7th century) more rather than that of Kuiji (632-682).
These points found in the short descriptions of P’an piryang non probably express the features of Wŏnhyo’s logic and not of his logical misinterpretation. We need an even more detailed examinations of P’an piryang non from the viewpoints of textual criticism and logic.
목차
Abstract
Introduction
P’an piryang non and the Antinomic Reason
Textual Problem
Wŏnhyo’s Solution
Conclusion
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Wŏnhyo’s Antinomic Inference and Wengui
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2019 .12
-
New Discoveries in Wŏnhyo’s P’an piryang non: Focusing on the Akebono Fragmentary Text and Fragments Found in Auction Catalogues
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2019 .12
-
Logic and Religion in Wŏnhyo’s Buddhism: Focusing on Wŏnhyo’s Critical Discussions on Inference
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2019 .12
-
The Pure Land of the One Mind in Wŏnhyo’s Thought
Journal of Korean Religions
2015 .04
-
Sthiramati, Paramārtha, and Wŏnhyo: On the Sources of Wŏnhyo’s Chungbyŏn punbyŏllon so
Journal of Korean Religions
2020 .01
-
元暁撰 『無量寿経宗要』研究方法改革論 : 日本仏教における元暁浄土教の評価の変移に着目して
불교학보
2018 .03
-
디그나가 인식논리에 대한 동아시아 불교논리에로의 변용 - 현장의 유식비량을 둘러싼 논쟁을 중심으로 -
한국불교학
2024 .08
-
Wŏnhyo’s Views on the Buddha-nature of Insentient Things as Presented in the Yŏlban chongyo
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2017 .06
-
원효의 『二障義』 <顯了門>에 나타난 해석상의 특징
불교연구
2017 .08
-
현행 〈동아시아사〉 교과서의 불교사 서술의 문제점과 개선 방안
역사교육
2019 .09
-
서양과 동양의 차이 : 동일성의 논리와 동일성과 차이의 논리를 중심으로
신학과세계
2016 .03
-
규기의 반야경 교판(敎判)과 사분설(四分說)에 대한 원효의 비판적 견해
종교교육학연구
2023 .02
-
Counterargument to the West : Buddhist Logicians’ Criticisms of Christianity and Republicanism in Meiji Japan
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2017 .12
-
동아시아에서의『대승기신론』해석의 전개
철학사상
2016 .05
-
편하설(C.F. Berheisel)의 『論理略解』연구:근대전환공간의 최초의 한글 논리학 교과서
현대유럽철학연구
2021 .01
-
元暁撰『判比量論』の三種の断簡
불교학보
2019 .12
-
지구화시대의 문화 담론과 독일의 동아시아 인식 — 유교자본주의론을 중심으로 —
사림
2018 .01
-
<동아시아사> 교육과정 개정 논의를 위한 제언
역사교육논집
2021 .01
-
근대 渡滿 일본인의 中國人像 : 제국의식의 투영
중국근현대사연구
2017 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-022-000276862