메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Gregor PAUL (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
저널정보
동국대학교 불교학술원 International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture Vol.29 No.2
발행연도
2019.12
수록면
11 - 39 (29page)
DOI
10.16893/IJBTC.2019.06.29.2.11

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In my reflections about logic and religion in Wŏnhyo’s Buddhism, I presuppose that there exist logical laws normatively valid for all human beings. My analyses then focus on the question of whether Wŏnhyo held that in, and because of, certain Buddhist teachings, some such laws as for instance the Principle of non-contradiction need not be accepted. Answering this question in the negative, I argue that Wŏnhyo, in spite of being a devout Buddhist, uncompromisingly rejected logical inconsistencies, thus comparing favorably to many medieval Christian scholastics. In particular, I deal with Wŏnhyo’s use of “skillful means” (upāya) as a device to avoid contradiction. However, I also admit that important questions remain open, and I try to make it clear that, from a methodological point of view, skillful means is a rather dubious tool to solve logical problems.

목차

Abstract
My Basic Interests and Convictions
Religious or Sacred Teachings and Logicalness in Medieval Christian Scholasticism and in Wŏnhyo
Paradoxical Logic, Mādhyamika Logic, and “Logic of Unlimited Affirmation”
Dan Lusthaus’ Translation of the Critical Discussion, and My Analyses of Wŏnhyo’s Logic
Inconsistencies in Buddhist Teachings, Methods to Solve Them and Related Questions
The Relationship Between Sacred Teachings and Logicalness According to the Treatise on the Ten Ways of Resolving Controversies, the Doctrinal Essentials of the Sūtra of Immeasurable Life and the Critical Discussion
Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-022-000276882