지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동국대학교 불교학술원 International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture International Journal of Buddhist Thought & Culture Vol.27 No.1
- 발행연도
- 2017.6
- 수록면
- 215 - 237 (23page)
- DOI
- 10.16893/IJBTC.27.01.08
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The problem of whether insentient things, such as fences, walls, tiles and stones or grass, trees, mountains and rivers have Buddha-nature was at the center of controversies among Chinese Buddhist schools, such as Tiantai or Huayan. This problem was a much discussed subject in Chinese and Japanese Buddhism, and later made a further impact beyond the boundaries of Buddhism. This article explores Silla Buddhists’ position with respect to this issue, by examining Wŏnhyo’s 元曉 (617~686) Yŏlban chongyo 涅槃宗要(Doctrinal Essentials of the Nirvana Sutra).
Wŏnhyo’s theory of the Buddha-nature of insentient things contains two important points: First, Wŏnhyo inherited Jingying Huiyuan’s doctrine of the Buddha-natures of the Dharma Body and the Reward Body and asserted that the Buddha-nature of the Dharma Body abides in both sentient and insentient things, while the Buddhanature of the Reward Body exists only in sentient beings, but not in insentient things, such as fences, walls, tiles, and stones. Second, Wŏnhyo defined the essence of Buddhanature as the one mind and defined the Buddha-natures of the Dharma Body and the Reward Body respectively as the realm of intrinsic purity and the realm that accords with impurity. He demonstrated the relationship between the Buddha-natures of the Dharma Body and the Reward Body by using the logic of the one mind and the two approaches, thereby reconciling the Buddha-nature of the Dharma Body of insentient things with that of the Reward Body of sentient beings on the basis of the one mind. Such a way in which the notion of conditioned arising of the tathāgatagarbha and the theory of Dharma nature are combined with each other constitutes the main feature of Wŏnhyo’s position on Buddha-nature. Wŏnhyo inherited Jingying Huiyuan’s and Jiaxing Jizang’s views on the one hand, and displayed his originality in demonstrating the Buddha-nature of insentient things from the position of the conditioned arising of the tathāgatagarbha.
Wŏnhyo’s theory of the Buddha-nature of insentient things contains two important points: First, Wŏnhyo inherited Jingying Huiyuan’s doctrine of the Buddha-natures of the Dharma Body and the Reward Body and asserted that the Buddha-nature of the Dharma Body abides in both sentient and insentient things, while the Buddhanature of the Reward Body exists only in sentient beings, but not in insentient things, such as fences, walls, tiles, and stones. Second, Wŏnhyo defined the essence of Buddhanature as the one mind and defined the Buddha-natures of the Dharma Body and the Reward Body respectively as the realm of intrinsic purity and the realm that accords with impurity. He demonstrated the relationship between the Buddha-natures of the Dharma Body and the Reward Body by using the logic of the one mind and the two approaches, thereby reconciling the Buddha-nature of the Dharma Body of insentient things with that of the Reward Body of sentient beings on the basis of the one mind. Such a way in which the notion of conditioned arising of the tathāgatagarbha and the theory of Dharma nature are combined with each other constitutes the main feature of Wŏnhyo’s position on Buddha-nature. Wŏnhyo inherited Jingying Huiyuan’s and Jiaxing Jizang’s views on the one hand, and displayed his originality in demonstrating the Buddha-nature of insentient things from the position of the conditioned arising of the tathāgatagarbha.
목차
Abstract
Introduction
Jingying Huiyuan and Jiaxiang Jizang’s Views on the Buddha-nature of Insentient Things
The Buddha-nature of the Dharma Body and the Buddha-nature of theReward Body in the Yŏlban chongyo
The Logic of the Awakening of Faith and the Buddha-nature ofInsentient Things
Comparison to Fabao, Fazang, Chengguan’s Interpretations of theBuddha-nature of Insentient Things
References
참고문헌 (13)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Pure Land of the One Mind in Wŏnhyo’s Thought
Journal of Korean Religions
2015 .04
-
Logic and Religion in Wŏnhyo’s Buddhism: Focusing on Wŏnhyo’s Critical Discussions on Inference
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2019 .12
-
『대승기신론(大乘起信論)』의 불이원론(不二元論)에 대한 두 가지 해석:법장(法藏)과 원효(元曉)의 주석을 중심으로
불교학보
2021 .12
-
밀교의 ‘대일여래’와 원불교의 ‘법신불 일원’의 비교연구 : 불타관의 발달사를 중심으로
원불교사상과종교문화
2016 .09
-
Buddha-nature, Critical Buddhism, and Early Chan
불교학리뷰
2017 .01
-
Sthiramati, Paramārtha, and Wŏnhyo: On the Sources of Wŏnhyo’s Chungbyŏn punbyŏllon so
Journal of Korean Religions
2020 .01
-
천태불교에서 불성의 의미 – 담연의 무정불성을 중심으로 -
한국불교학
2022 .11
-
원측교학에서의 일승의 요의[一乘了義] -일체개성(一切皆成)과 오성각별(五性各別)의 교리적 근거에 대한 고찰-
한국사상사학
2015 .01
-
『大般涅槃經後分』 연구
인도철학
2018 .01
-
우데나 붓다에게 투영된 변곡점 : 불상전파와 문학의 조응
동서비교문학저널
2016 .12
-
Man and Nature
인간연구
2017 .01
-
심종문 湘西 문학세계가 지닌 생태여성주의의 가능성
중국문화연구
2016 .11
-
후기 조사선(祖師禪)에 나타난 노장(老莊)사상과 선사상의 변용
禪學(선학)
2022 .12
-
중국 불성사상의 전개 과정 연구
원불교사상과종교문화
2021 .09
-
승량(僧亮)의 불성(佛性) 사상
철학논집
2023 .05
-
만해 한용운의 대승 선사상과 인생 연구 - 『선(禪)과 인생』을 중심으로 -
동아시아불교문화
2019 .01
-
New Discoveries in Wŏnhyo’s P’an piryang non: Focusing on the Akebono Fragmentary Text and Fragments Found in Auction Catalogues
International Journal of Buddhist Thought and Culture
2019 .12
-
원효의 『二障義』 <顯了門>에 나타난 해석상의 특징
불교연구
2017 .08
-
청화 염불(선)의 실천 생활화 고찰
원불교사상과종교문화
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2018-022-000966057