메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
이재석 (성대학교)
저널정보
역사비평사 역사비평 역사비평 2020년 봄호(통권 제130호)
발행연도
2020.2
수록면
261 - 283 (24page)
DOI
10.38080/crh.2020.02.130.261

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This article focused on the basic attitude of Japan about the fall of Baekje·Goguryeo and subsequent reorganization of East Asian order.
For Silla’s ruling class, “Sam-han Iltong”(“Three Hans were One”) Notion had important implications. However, upheaval of Northeast Asia in the 7th century, the positioning himself to Sam-han was an significant issue for the Japanese people in power. While the political meaning of “Sam-han Iltong” was important to Silla ruling class, the ideology of “Subjugation of Sam-han” was important for Japan. It was a self- rationalization necessary for establishing ancient nation, Japan(Wa), and was a positioning for themselves as well.
It is well known Balhae established itself in the 8th century and declared itself a successor to Goryeo in diplomatic relations with Japan. But there is no indication Japan regarded the political situation in Northeast Asia as a concept of confrontation between the northern and southern countries. At least, these subject didn’t mean much to Japan. What was important to him was his position itself and his position on the other countries.

목차

1. 들어가면서
2. 백제·고구려 멸망 과정에 대한 왜의 인식
3. 친당 〈백제〉, 친신라 〈고구려국〉의 등장
4. ‘삼한일통’과 ‘삼한복속’
5. 나오면서
참고문헌

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0