메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
임준홍 (충남연구원) 홍성효 (공주대학교)
저널정보
한국주거환경학회 주거환경 住居環境 통권 제18권 제4호 (통권 제50호)
발행연도
2020.12
수록면
91 - 103 (13page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
There is ongoing concern that Naepo newtown having been constructed for balanced regional growth could make the centers of Hongsung and Yesan vacant. Thus, this study analyzes the residents’ satisfaction of residential environment and intention to move to Naepo, and suggests policy implications for improvement of residential environments. The empirical results can be summarized as follow.
The degree to which residents are satisfied with residential conditions is measured as 3.16 out of 5 points and affected obviously by a convenient facility and job-related factor. According to the results on intention to migrate to Naepo, 26.0% of respondents wanted to move and the most influential factors for migration were summarized as (i) convenient facilities and job, (ii) safety and cleanliness, and (iii) disaster. Thus, dissatisfaction with respect to physical, psychological, and safety perspectives works as a key reason for residents to leave. It is expected to be deepened after COVID-19.
Especially, people who are in their thirties or forties or college-educated, work in government offices, white-collar or professional jobs, or have higher income are more likely to move to Naepo. That is, relatively young and elite people tend to leave, and thus the area would lose its vitality.
In order to improve residential environments with help of local government which is unfortunately limited in finance, it is necessary to link the central government’s project of supplying living SOC. In addition, it is required to supply living SOC which is multi-purposed with various functions because both population and the demand are decreasing in rural areas.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론 및 선행연구 고찰
Ⅲ. 연구설계
Ⅳ. 실증분석
Ⅴ. 결론 및 정책제언
참고문헌

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2021-595-001406857